1 



INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



Longmead v. Holliaay, 20 L. J. Ex., 430 



—140 

 LongstaflF i\ Meagoc, 4 N. & M, 211 ; 2 



Ad. &E., 167— 4(!1 

 Lord r. City of Sydney, 12 Moo., 473-104 

 Loring v. \Varburton, 11 Ex., 870 ; 2.^) 



L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 125 ; 28 L. J. 



(N, S.)E]i., 31—274 

 Lorymer v. Smith, 1 B. & C, 1—482 

 Louth V. Druinmond (cited in Manley 



Smith's "Law of Master and Ser- 

 vant," 48)— 203 

 Lowe V. Peers, 4 Burr., 2225—110 



V. Ross, 5 Ex,, 553— 44.'i 



Lowden v. Kay, 6 D. &R., 20 ; 4 B. & C, 



3-143 

 Lowndes r. Fountain, 11 Ex., 487—336 

 Lovel) V. Smith, 3 C. B., 120-87 

 Lumley v. Hodgson, 16 East, 99 — 425 

 Lucas V. Novosilieski, 1 Esp., 296 — 199 



r. Tarleton— 296 



Lucy v. Mouflet— 485, 529 

 Lurting v. Conn, 1 Jr. Ch. Rep., 23—310 

 Lyde v. Russell, 1 B. & Ad., 394—462 

 Lynch v. Nurden, 1 Q. B., 37 ; 4 P. & D., 



677—350 

 Lyon V. Mells, 5 East, 428—234, 236 

 Lyons v. Martin, 8 Ad. k E., 512—211 



M. 



:vral.erley v. Shepherd, 10 Bing., 99—497 

 McCance, v. London and N. W. Rail. Co., 



31 L. J. (N. S.), 65 ; 34 L. J. (N. S.) 



Ex., 39—252 

 Machell v. EllLs, 1 C. & K., 682—270 

 Macintosh t\ Trotter, 3 M. & W., 184—461 

 Mackenzie v. Cox, 9 C. & P., 632—602 



V. Hancock,Ry. & Moo. , 436 - 593 



M'Kinnon v. Pen.son, 9 Ex., 609 ; and 23 



L. J. (N. S.) M. C, 97-103 

 M'Kone v. Wood, 5 G. & P., 1-161 

 Maclaughlin v. Pryor, 4 M. & G., 48—220 

 Macraanus u Cricket, 1 Ea.st, 106 — 211 

 V. Lanca-shire and Yorkshire 



Railway Co., Law Times, Feb. 20,1858; 



28 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 353—247, 254 

 Macnolty V. Fitzherbert, 27 L. J. (N. S.) 



Ch., 272—431 

 Magor v. Chadwick, 11 Ad. & E., 571 — 



180, 182 

 Mackin.son v. Rawlinson, 9 Price, 460 — 561 

 Mal.iehy v. Snper, 3 Bing. (N. C), 371 ; 3 



Scott, 723—163 



Malins c. Freeman — 540 

 Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire 

 Rail. Co. (app.) v. Wallis (resp.), 14 



C. B., 213-148 



Mann v. Lovejoy, Ry. & Moo., 355— 290, 415 

 Manning r. Lunn, 2 C. & K., 13—279, 439 



V. Wasdale, 5 Ad. & E., 758—78 



Mant V. Collins, 8 Q. B., 916—456 

 Margetsou r. Wright, 1 M. & Scott, 622 ; 



8 Bing., 454 ; 7 Bing., 603 : 5 M. & 



P., 696—571 

 Marfell v. South Wales Rail. Co., 29 L. J. 



(N. S.) C. P., 315; 8 C. B., 525-152 

 Marker v. Kenrick, 13 C. B., 188—309 

 Marlborough (Duke of) v. Osborn — 453 

 Marlow v. Thompson, 1 Dow. P. C. (N. S.), 



575-418 

 Marson v. Short, 2 Bing. (N. C), 111—559 

 Martin v. Cogan, 1 Hog., 120—308 

 V. Coulman, 4 L. J. (N. S.) K. E., 



37—329 

 V. Gilham, 2 N. & P., 568 ; 7 A. 



& E., 540—309 



V. Knollys, 8 T. R., 145—116 



V. Roe, 7 E. & B., 237—432 



V. Wallace— 585 



Martindale v. Smith, 1 Q. B., 389 ; 1 Q. 



& D., 1—495 

 Martyn (Adx. ) f . Clue, 18 Q. B., 661 — 



306, 427 

 Mason v. Hill, 5 B. & Ad., 1 ; 3 B. & Ad., 



304; 2 N. & M., 747—173, 174, 



175, 176 



V. Newland, 9 C. & P., 575—270 



V. Welbank [Welland], Skin., 238 



—446 

 Massey v. Goodall, 17 Q. B., 510—337 

 Masters v. Pollie, 2 Roll. Rep., 141—117 

 Matson v. Cook, 6 Scott, 179 ; 4 Bing. 



(N. C), 392—343 

 Mathe-son v. Hart, 2 C. L. R., 314 -438 



V. Parker, Oliphant, 343-570 



Matthews v. Leapingwell, 3 C. B., 912— 401 

 May r. Burdett, 9 Q. B., 121—155, 167 

 Mayfieldu Wadsley, 3 B. & C, 357 ; 5 



D. &R., 224-60, 67 

 Mechclenv. Wallace, 2 N. & P., 224s 7 



Ad. &E., 49; W. &W. &D., 40—66 

 Meddins v. William.s, Times, Feb., 1858— 



386- 

 Meggison i'. 'Lady Glamis, 7 Ex., 685—296 

 Mellish V. Motteux, 1 Peake, 115—551 

 Mennie v. Blake, 6 E. & B., 842—298 

 Meres v. Ansell, 3 Wils., 275-482 

 Meredith v. Megli, 2 E. & B., 364-503 



