Hi 



INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



Nixon r. Freeman, '20 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 



271—282 

 Kokes V. Gibbons, 20) L. J. (N. S.) Cli., 



20S, 433—311 

 Norfolk (Duchess of) v. Wiseman— 384 

 Norman r. Bell. 2 B. & Ad., 191—523 



V. Phillies, 14 M. & W., 277-503 



V. Wescombc, 2 M. & W., 349— 



352 

 North Eastern Railway Company v. Elliot 



—100 

 V. Cros- 



land— 100 

 North r. Smith, 10 C. B., 572-362 

 Northam r. Hurley, 1 E. & B., 665-189, 



191 

 Nortbam])ton (Mayor of) v. Ward, 1 Wils., 



107 ; 2Strac., 1238-517 

 Norton v. Herron, 1 C. & P., 648—420 

 Norwood r. Pitt, 29 L. J. (N. S.) Ex., 127 



— 358 

 Nowlan v. Ablctt, 2 C. M. & R., 54—207 

 Noye V. Reed, 1 M. & R., 63—131 

 Nuttall V. Staunton, 6 D. & R., 155 ; 3 B. 



& C, 51—290, 291 



0. 



Oastler v. Pound, N. R., Feb. 14, 1863- 



536 

 Ockeuden [Oekleden], 6 Henley, 27 L. J. 



(N. S.) Q. B., 361-477 

 Odiham v. Smith, Cro. Eliz., 589-444 

 Ongley v. Gardiner, 4 M. & W., 496—83, 



84 

 On.slow V. Eames, 2 Stark, 81—310, 568 

 Orchard v. Rackstraw, 9 G. B., 698—576 



V. Simpson, 2 C. B. (N. S.), 299 



— 494 

 Orr r. Fleming, Weekly Reporter, vol. 1, 



339—157 

 Osbond V. Meadows, 31 L. J. (N. S.) M. 



C, 238-377 

 Osborne v. Harvey, 1 You. & Coll. (N. C), 

 116-124 



V. Wise, 7 C. & P., 751-88 



Oswald V. Earl Grey, 24 L. J. (N. S.) Q. 



P.., 69—419 

 Oughton V. Scppings, 1 B. & Ad., 241 — 



345 

 Owens V. Denton, 1 G. M. & R., 711 — 



522 

 Owen V. Leigh, 3 B. & Al., 470-293 

 Oxley V. James, 13 M. & W., 209—290 



Oxley r. W^atts, 1 T. R., 12-344 

 Oxendalc v. Wetherall, 9 B. & C, 336 ; 4 



M. & Ry., 429—491 

 Oxford, Worcester and Wolverhampton 



Railway Co. (inre) (ex parte) jDeviaccs 



of Milward, 29 L. J. (N. S.) Ch., 215 



—539 



Page (Exor.) v. Pavey, 8 C. & P., 769— 



488 

 Pain V. Coombs, Law Times, May 2 and 

 Oct. 10, 1857—311, 415, 471 



V. Patrick, 3 Mod., 294—79 



Pad wick v. King, 29 L. J. (N. S.) M. C. 

 42-381 



-y. Tyndale, 28 L. J. (N. S.) Q. B., 



90-443 

 Palmer v. Temple — 478 



V. The Grand Junction Railway 



Company, 4 M. & W., 749—232 

 Pannell v. Mill, 3 C. B., 625—385 

 Pardington v. South Wales Railway Com- 

 pany, 1 H. & N., 392-244, 245, 

 248 

 Parish v. Sleeman, 29 L. J. (N. S.) Ch., 



53, 97—407 

 Parker v. Great Western Railway Company, 

 7 M. & G., 253, 7 Scott N. R., 835 

 274 



V. Ibbetson, 26 L. J. (N. S.) C. P., 



26-203 



i: Mitchell, 11 Ad. & E., 788 ; 3 P. 



& D., 655—84 



V. Wallis, 5 E. & B., 21-503 



V. Staniland, 11 East, 362—52 



V. Taswell, 27 L. J. (N. S.) Ch., 812 



— 414 

 Parkinson v. Lee, 2 East, 322—528 

 Parmenter v. Webber, 8 Taun., 593 ; 2 



Moore, 656—289 

 Parrington v. Moore, 2 Ex., 223—364 

 Parrott v. Anderson, 7 Ex., 93—277 

 Parry v. Deere, 2 H. & W., 395 ; 1 N. & 



P., 47 ; 5 Ad. &E., 551—417 

 Parsons v. Se.xton, 4 C. B., 899—484 

 Partridge v. Scott, 3 M. & W., 220 — 



101 

 Patrick v. Golerick, 3 M. & W., 483— 



348 

 Patteshall v. Tranter, 3 Ad. & E., 103, 4 



N. & M., 649—574 

 Patten v. Guukl, 7 Taun., 408—424 



