Ivi 



INDEX OF CASES CITED. 



Richards r. F17, 3 N. & T., 67— ISO 



V. Porter, 6 B. & C, 437 — .")05 



r. llicliards, 29 L. J. (N. S.) Ch., 



836—469 

 Richardson v. Brown, 1 Bing., 344 ; 8 

 Moore, 338 — 554 



V. Gifford, 1 Ad. & E., 52— 



417 



I'. N. E. Ry. Co., 7 L. R. C. 



r., 75—254 

 Rich V. Woolly, 7 Bing., 651— 26S, 284 

 Ricketts i'. Birmingham Junction Railway 

 Company, 12 C. B., 160—146, 150 



r. Salwey, 2 B. & Aid., 360— 



352 

 Bider V. Smith, 3 T. R., 766-133 

 Ridge {ex parfe) 1 Yes. & Beam., 360 — 



524 

 Ridgway v. Stafford (Lord), 6 Ex., 404— 

 298, 301 



V. Wharton,3DeG.,M. &G.,677, 



693—420, 474, 476, 505 

 Rigg V. Lonsdale (Earl) 1 H. & N. , 923 ; 



11 Ex., 654—386 

 Riley V. Bazendale, 30 L. J. Ex., 87—215 



V. Warden, 2 Ex., 59—207 



Rimel V. Sampayo, 1 C. & P., 254-222 

 Riseley v. Ryle, 11 M. & W., 16—295 

 Rivis V. Watson, 5 M. ."fe W., 255—280 

 Roads r. Trumpington, 5 L. R. Q. B., 56 



—120 

 Roberts r. Barker, 1 C. & 1\[., 808—324 



r. Great Western Railway Company, 



27 L. J. (X. S.) C. P., 266—152 



V. Smith, 2 H. & N., 213—219 



V. Tunstall, 4 Hare, 257, 14 L. J. 



Ch., 184—112 

 Robertson v. Gauntlett, 16 M. & W., 289 

 —352 



(appl.) V. Burkett (resp.). 



Weekly Reporter, Nov. 27, 1858—214 

 Robinson r. Hindman, 3^4 Esp., 234 — 

 ■ 203 



V. Purday, 16 M. & W., 11—404 



V. Rutter, 4 E. & B., 954—591 



V. Vaughton, 8 C. & P., 252—366 



Roden V. Eyton, 6 C. B., 427—299, 332 

 Rodgers v. Parker, IS C. B., 112-296 

 Kodmel v. Eden (Bart), 1 F. & F. 542— 



467 

 Rodwell V. Phillips, 9 M. k W., 501—51, 



54 

 Rolfe V. Patcrson, 2 Bro., P. C, 436—312 

 Rolls V. Rock, 2 Selw. N. P., 1287-109 

 Rondeau v. Wyatt, 2 H. Bl., 63—505 



Rooth V. North Eastern Railway Company, 



2 L. R. Ex., 173-252 



V. Wilson, 1 B. & AL, 59—138 



Roots V. Dormer (Lord), 4 B. & Ad., 77 — 



478 

 Ross V. Smith, 1 B. & Ad., 907—398 

 Routledge v. Hislop, 29 L. J. (N. S.) M. C, 



90—205 

 Rowbotham v. Wilson, 27 L. J. (N. S.) 



Q. B.— 80, 81 

 Rowo V. Young, 2 B. & B., 195, 234—426 

 Rowlston V. Hardy — 386 

 Rudd V. Scott, 2 Scott, N. R., 631—364 

 Eudge V. Wiunell, 12 Beav., 357—443 

 Rusby V. Scarlett, 5 Esp., 76-222 

 Ryanr. Shilcock, 7 Ex., 72-284 



S. 



Sainsburyr. Matthews, 4 M. & W., 343— 



51, 53 

 Saffery v. Elgood, 3 N. & M., 346—275 

 Salisbmy (Marquis of) v. Gladstone— 99 

 Salkeld (Clerk) v. Johnson, 2 C. B., 749— 



398 

 Salter v. Woollams, 2 M. & G., 650—513 

 Salmon v. Ward, 2 C. & P., 211—542 

 Sampson v. Hodinott, 1 C. B. (N. S.), 590 



—187, 194 

 Sanders v. Jameson, 2 C. & K., 557 — 485 

 Sandys v. Mayor, kc, of Beverley, 12 M. 



& W., 568-404 

 Sarch v. Blackburn, 4 C. & P., 297—163 

 Sari V. Bourdillon, 1 C. B. (N. S.), 188— 



507 

 Saunders v. Baldy, 1 N. R. Q. B., 87— 

 375 



V. Kirwan, 30 L. J. (N. S.) C. P., 



351—354 



V. Newman, 1 B. & Al., 258- 



172, 174 



-y. Topp, 4 Ex., 390—583 



Saunderson v. Griffiths, 8 D. & R., 643 ; 

 5B. &C., 909—306 



r. Hanson, 3 C. & P., 314— 



440 



V. Jackson, 2 Bos. & P., 238 - 



506 

 Savage v. Connor, 7 Tr. Jiir., 161 — 309 

 Scales V. Pickering, 6 L. J. C. P., 53—351 

 Scarfe v. Morgan, 4 M. & W., 268—563, 



590 

 Schneider v. Norris, 2 M. & S., 288-506 

 Schwinge v. Dowell — 106 



