198 
History, Schooten, 1656; and Fermat, 1679 ; but the best res- 
toration is that of Dr Simson, 1749. 
6. The Inclinations ; these were restored by Ghetal- 
dus, in his Apollonius Redivivus, 1607: To this there is 
a Supplement by Anderson, 1612. There is also a 
restoration by Dr Horsley, 1770; and another by Reu- 
ben Burrow, 1779. 
Theodosius and Menelaus: These were published by 
Maurolicus in 1558, and Burrow gave T osius in 
1675. There is also an Oxford edition by Hunter, in 
1707. 
Proclus, Commentariorum in Primum Euclidis librum 
Libri iv. Latine vertit F. Baroccius, 1560. Proclas has 
also been given in English by Taylor, 1788. 
Eratosthenes, Geometria, §c. cum annot. 1672. 
Veterum Mathematicorum Athenwi, Bitonis, Apollodo- 
ri, Heronis, Philonis, et aliorum, Opera Gr. et Lat. 
1693. > 
Lucas de Burgo, Summa de Arithmetica, Geometria, 
&e. 1494. 
Albert Durer, Institutiones Geometric, 1532. 
Buteo, De Quadratura Circuli, 1559. aise 
Ramus, Arithmetice, lib. ii. Geometrice, lib. xxvi. 
1580. U 
Vieta, Opera Mathematica, 1589. 
Vieta, Variorum de reb. math. responsorum, lib. viii. 
1596. 
Lucas Valerius, De centro Gravitalis Solidorum, 1604. 
Metius, Avithmet. et Geomet. pract. 1611. 
Anderson, Supplementum Apollonii Redivivi, 1612. 
———— Autioroyiz Pro Zetetico Apolloniani proble- 
matis ase jam ~ seams editoin Sup. Apol. Red. 1615. 
——— Theoremata Kabormorega A. Fr, Vieta Fon= 
teracensi excogitata, &c. 1615. 
Vindicie Archimedis, &e. 1616, 
———— Exer. Mathemat. &c. 1619. 
Kepler, Nova Stereometria, &c. 1618. 
Van Ceulen, De Circulo et adscriptis, 1619. 
‘Snellius, Cyclometricus, 1621. 
- La Faille, Theoremata de centro Gravitatis partium 
circuli et ellipsis, 1632. 
Guildin, De Centro Gravitalis, &c. 1635. 
Cavallerius, Geometria indivisibilium cortinuerum noe 
vd quadam ratione promota, 1635. 
Cavallerius, Exercitationes Geometric, 1647. 
Des Cartes, Geomeétrie, 1637. 
Toricelli, Opera Geometrica, 1644. 
Gregory St Vincent, Opus Geometricum quadrature 
circuli et Sectionum Cont, 1647. 
Oughtred, Clavis mathematica, 1653. 
Schooten, Exer. Mathematicorum, lib. v. 1657. 
Pascal, A. Dettonville Lettres (on the Cycloid) 1659. 
Ricci, Exercit. Geom. de’ maa. et minimis, 1666. 
James Gregory, Vera Circuli et Hyperbole ‘Quadra- 
tura, 1667. 
James Gregory, Geometria Pars Universalis, 1668. 
James Gregory, Ewercilationes Geometrice, 1668. 
- Tacquet, ra Omnia Mathematica, 1669. 
Huygens, Opera, collected by s’Gravesande, 1751. 
Barrow, Lectiones Optica et Geometricew, 1674. 
Barrow, Lectiones Mathematica, 1683. 
David Gregory, Ewer. de dimen, Figurarum, 1684. 
David Gregory, Practical Geometry, 1745. 
De Omerique, Analysis Geometrica, 1698. 
Sharp, Geometry Improved, &c. 1718. : 
GEOMETRY. 
times called Plane, andthe latter Solid geometry.) 
Stewart, General Theorems, 1746. 
Stewart, Propositiones Geometrice, 1763. 
R. Simson, a m Reliqua, 1776. . 
' Traill, Life of R. Simson, 1812. : 
noma Simpson, of Geometry, 1747, and 
1760. 
Thomas Simpson, Select Exercises, 1752. 
Boscovich, Elementa Universe Matheseos, 1754, 
Montucla, Histoire des Recherches sur la quadrature 
de Cercle, 1754. : 
Emerson, Elements of Geometry, 1763. 4 oe 
Lawson, 4 Dissertation on the Geometrical Analysis of 
the-Ancients. ; 
Lawson, A Synopsis of Data for constructing Trian- 
gles, 1773. 
West, Elements of Mathematics, 1784. 
L’Huillier, Polygonometrie. 
Lacroix, Elemens de Geometrie iptive, 1795. 
Mascheroni, Geometrie du Compas, 1798. 
Mascheroni, Traité d’A 
Monge, Geomelrie Descriptive, 1799. 4 
_ Playfair, Origin and Investigation of Porisms. Edin. 
Trans, vol. iii. ' 
Wallace, Geometrical Porisms. Edin. Trans. vol. iv. 
Carnot, Geomeirie de Position, 1808. 14 
Legendre, Elements de Geometrie, ninth edit. 1812. 
Leslie, Elements of Geometry, Geometrical Analysis, 
and Plane Trigonometry, 2d edit. 1811. 4 
The three books which Mr Leslie has given on the 
Geometrical Analysis, are a great acquisition to elemen- 
tary geometry. , 
‘Creswell, On Geometrical Maxima and Minima. 
To such as are entering on the ge Pak ogres 
ing works: 
we would recommend any one of the fo) 
Simson’s Euclid, Playfair’s Geometry, Legendre Geo- 
metrie, Leslie’s Geometry. Indeed, we would recom- 
pordriy gy ain Legendre’s work with any of the 
others, We have chiefly kept it in view in drawing up 
wees 
the space it fills from space in_ 
A surface again’ 
d ; 
a boundary, or waren By m 
may separate a portion of it fromthe remain bis 
a line, which can have but'one dimension. = = 
of magnitude, viz. solids, surfa- 
discussion. tedw of 
The elements of geometry are commonly divided into | 
two Parts ; one treats of the properties of lines‘and fi- _ 
gures described upon a plane surface ; and the other re- 
lates to the properties of solids: the'former is some-_ 
J tiene Se 
t. oi? 4 : | To 
