76 SHEEP HUSBANDRY IN THE SOUTH. 



Even in the case of eitlier of the two classes of soils before treateil i>f 

 (those now producing thinnish pasturage, or which can be converted into 

 pastures simply by plowing and seeding), one or more green manuring 

 crops would form a most excellent and accelerating initiatory step, and, 

 where suflicient capital is possessed, I have no doubt, a most economica 

 one, toward their fertilization. 



In view of all my preceding statements, do you ask me if I advocate 

 fiheep husbandry exclusively, on all the lands at the South which already 

 are, jr should be devoted to grazing] Most assuredly not. I have al- 

 ready laid it down as a maxim that " agricultural production should bo 

 controlled by the demand or want, and the adaptation of the country to 

 such production." By this rule, the South should, at least, never impoit a 

 horse,* a mule, a pound of beef, pork, butter, cheese or wool. She wa?iis 

 them all, and she can 2)roduce them all mere economically than she can 

 import them. That declared impossibility in politics, an imj^erium in hn- 

 2>erio, should be in Agriculture, so far as it may be consistently with the 

 above maxim, the attitude of every farm and plantation. Each should be 

 independent to the greatest economical extent, so far as the production of 

 the necessaries, comforts and luxuries of life are concerned, of every other 

 farm or plantation in the world ! This mixed and multifarious farming is 

 objected to by theorists, inasmuch as it trenches on the division of laboi 

 principle. But it favors rotation, and thereby prevents the exhaustio:i ol 

 soils — leads to a more bountiful use of the every-day comforts of lifet — 

 and, finally, it is less hazardous. The one-crop farmer, if crop and market 

 are both in their most favf)rable state, realiaes great jirofits. But if the 

 market is poor, or the crop small, the loss is proportionately large. The 

 farmer pursuing mixed husbandry will not generally fall greatly behind 

 the hesi profits "^'f the other, and his losses are rarely considerable. It is 

 battel to play for a hit than a gammon, where, as in the case of the small 

 capitalist, affluence or penury "stand the hazard of the die !" 



If the above positions are true, the South is called upon to increase the 

 Dreading of other domestic animals as well as sheep. To an extent suffi- 

 cient to supply her own wants, I consider her imperiously called upon so 

 to do. I advocate the breeding of sheep specially — on a vastly more ex- 

 tended scale — because, as has been already shown, they are the bpst (if 

 not the only) reclaimers of your unproductive lands ; and because in that 

 surplus of the products of grazing, which these extensive reclamations will 

 bring about, they furnish you the exporting\ article (wool) for which you 

 can find the largest cxtra-limital market, and in growing which you can best 

 co?npcte with other producers. 



Let us suppose, for the sake of the argument, that these newly reclaimed 

 pasture lands would carry heavy beasts as well as sheep, and with equal 

 bei.efit to the land. After supplying the home demand, what would be 

 done with the surplus hf)rses, mules and beeves 1 To what markets in the 

 world could you export horses and mules, with the exception of some of 

 the West India islands — the markets of which a few thousand head of 

 these animals would annually glut 1 Do you ask me what would prevent 

 your sending your surplus beef to England ] Nothing. But neither the 

 South, nor the North, nor the East, can compete with the great North-west 



• Unlees for the improvement of breeds. 



t I mean by this thiit the planter who raises aU the necessaries of life will be more liberal of them thai 

 lAe one who piirclianes them 



J I do i.ot use 'he word hnre in i*,8 technical sense. I mean carried beyond mere local limits for sale— 

 whether that sale be effected 'n tbr same ^tate, in some other part of the U. S., or abroad. 



