Tlv .- . o .ir. to ti-"- public, ho'/evor, In the 

 oxoroia <v -VJ t>- or i t y . If vo u-v-^t, lo.-,e.l con '.Ationc 

 y and interfere -?ith local bu-.inca* T/O rant Jiv.tify 



*.or perrcar:--!n*-, benefit, j: Or. the: othor 



', I bolievo It io neooo^ary to aAJ'j.it our nanago v?nt to 

 ;-il ncods of lors-il aoiTSiunitioB. I think thio oan no 

 -iid Ttill adhon to the treat. 1 , general nrlnoiploo. 



\!e ere horo to nonage thfi foo--lo'r. resources. 

 p. HfiJidlcy hau 'Toll etatod "The object" of For^^t vvragor.-ni 

 to oooure th* nartinuM not benefits for tho public t^rou^ 

 ^rotootion, utilization, dovclcjr'ont 

 thpsr- natural rcoourcoa. 1 * 



Vou to eocuro eueh benefits thoro muat be 

 .ciny in administration - .thoro nuot Tsn regard for 

 pnr ox'ooncltturo of funds, Juot the namo as if "ou rr^r-f 

 hired to manage a corporation or a pri-atn busiiic-Ki. 

 so thoroughly inoonaeo re as to bear of oone public official 

 in charge of public funclo Just wasting then bocuuno thoy 

 arc public fundo - unions it i'j to hoar pnoplo remark: ' r cll, 

 tho Govornncnt ii payinj: for this anrl.I'n ,f r ,oing to r ^ct. out of 

 it all I can r/hethor I ^.n entitled to it or not. Undo Sam 

 ha3 lota of uor* ->y an.-; he io logitinato proy." A lot of 

 people think thio way about public affairs and public funds. 

 I flon't think the accusation c^xild to lodged againat nany 

 offioerr. in tho Foreat iorvico. /hat I ''ant to say is that 

 membcro of thy Service are not wilfully cheating the t-ovcrr- 

 mc::t out, of its Juat dr.os. They \ould roncnt unh an 

 acnusat.ior. as a personal affror.t. But if ^e -.top M-d f-li. 1 ;, 

 are we -Ui") that we are nalcirib the iccct of our 'f forts? On 

 tho other hand niggardliness or *5tingineoo is not of-onony. 

 V.'e inuut spend money to aave money. T'^.ere nuat alvayn bo a 

 oortiin Hi?.ount. of initial investment if -70 are later tc get 

 rotun.a . 



Nov vhat have tlv valu to t^o corrnum^.y and cc.or. 



-.tdainintrat.lon tr dc> "ith the plan Idoa? T ihoulO. say 

 they e.r' inseparable. No ^iecft of vork otir be ^70 11 cloi.o or 

 economically dono unlt^js it in ^ell planijr"'. There Io : 

 question tbat t.hr-rr hcta been a lot of lo-t moticn: ir. the 



ic-3. The ':lan idea io Just a littln ^a'jier ai.c 1 "in->l r 

 way of oayin^ "aoientiflc naimgonien*.,'' r/M.ch 'iaa bf > 

 frightonlrg HO nany of u--j in tM3 03~trict during the last 

 yoar or so. And what in 'scientific nanuge^crt?' T'-.ere fts 

 certainly nothing net/ about it.. It iu as old as baimar 

 activity. r t . r _ from tinn imroonorial have appllnd tho 

 principle, often unconncioualy, ii. t?,- acquisi*^or of gain. 



;^eans the rroatut -onsiM :-e mlt from tlic ; 

 of a ,T,i.ven .-n-:ou..r nar^y or t'f'rt. If I Muni 



over to ono of you nei: a ranch vliich un.'.or nor.i'l o<y ^ 

 of ' soil proiluotivt i" 'tM r 



the if the v.ar showed moro of ar a- r 



