Gushing — Douglass. 345 



Peter H. (II. p. 165 : 46, vi.), d. at Wey. 14 Feb., 1889, set. 89 yrs. 

 10 months. 



KoY Harmon, s. of William W. (II. p. 185 : 122, iv.), was b. in 

 Hing. Apr. 19, 1888. 



Ruth (II. p. 167 : 51, ix.), m. Thomas Totman. She died at Nor- 

 well, 19 Aug. 1889, aet. 90 yrs. 



Ruth Jacob, dau. of David S. (II. p. 183 : 114), d. 3 March, 1888, 

 set. 1 yr. 5 mos. 



Samuel A., s. of Ned (II. p. 166: 47), d. at Roxbury 10 March, 

 1889, set. 73 yrs. 



Sarah, wid. of William G. (II. p. 174 : 78), d. 9 Dec. 1887, at. 

 71st yr. 



Sarah A., dau. of Delmont 0. (II. p. 180 : 100), m. June 13, 1889, 

 Gustavus B. Corthell. 



Thomas (II. p. 183 : 117), was a s. of Thomas of Wey., and was 

 b. Oct. 10, 1787. His w., whom he m. May 3, 1810, was Rachel 

 Green of Wey. Their ch., in addition to those previously named, 

 were — 



Thomas, 1811, d. (was lost overboard from a fishing schooner) 29 July, 1832, 



set. 21 yrs. 

 Henry, 1817, d. 2 March, 1835, aet. 18 yrs. 



DALEY. 



Bridget, wid. of Patrick (II. p. 186), d. 2 Apr. 1888, set. 79 yrs. 

 Town Report says 88 yrs. 



Catherine, dau. of Thomas (II. p. 187), d. 28 July, 1888, set. 3 yrs. 

 8 mos. 



John, s. of Bartholomew (II. p. 186: 2, iv.), was b. in Hing. 

 Feb. 4, 1887. 



Joseph Arthur, s. of James (II. p. 186 : 3), was b. in Hing. Dec. 

 29 18SS 



Mary E., dau. of John (II. p. 186 : 2, i.), m. July 1, 1888, John 

 Cronan of Boston. 



Michael Bernard, s. of Michael J. (II. p. 187 : ii.), was b. in Hing. 

 Nov. 3, 1887. Also (previously) a s. b. Sept. 6, 1886. 



DAMON. 



Maurice (II. p. 187 : 2, iv.), d. at Rainsford Island, Boston Har- 

 bor, 28 Oct., 1888, ait. 56th yr. 



Nathaniel (11. p. 188 : note), who married Deborah Loring, d. at 

 Baltimore, Md., says tradition, of yellow fever. 



DORBY. 



Rev. Jonathan of Scit., d. at the residence of Hon. Benjamin Lin- 

 coln in Hing., after five days' sickness, 22 Apr., 1754. 



DOUGLASS. 



In the rec. given (contributed) on p. 195 of Vol. II., the ancestral 

 line, says the family historian, should include one more John, making 

 Luther A. of the 6th instead of the 5th generation, thus : Luther 



