36 



Resume of yield. 

 CANE, VARIETY No. 161. 



Clean cane worked tons. . *9. 475 



Topped cane worked do. . . *11. 786 



First inassecuite obtained pounds . . t2, 143 



First sugar obtained (91.4 polarization) do t9 ( J5 



First sugar reduced to 100 polarization do 909 



First sugar per ton, clean cane do 105 



First sugar per ton, topped cane do 84. 4 



First sugar 100 polarization per ton, clean cane do 96 



First sugar 100 polarization per ton, topped cane do 77 



Second sugar obtained (84.1 polarization) do 255 



Second sugar reduced to 100 polarization do 214. 5 



Second sugar per ton, clean cane do 26. 9 



Second sugar per ton, topped cane do 21. 6 



Second sugar 100 polarization per ton, clean cane do 22. 6 



Second sugar 100 polarization per ton, topped cane do 18. 2 



Yield of first and second sugar per acre* do 1,356 



EXPERIMENT NO. 11 ALCOHOL PROCESS ONLY. 



Date : October 17, 1891. 



Variety and plat: India and Orange; plat 8. 



Gross cane (topped cane) tons. . 11. 480 



Trash do... 1.240 



Clean cane do. . . 10. 240 



Clean cane removed in samples .do ... . 075 



Skimmings lost, calculated to clean cane, do ... . 619 



Net clean cane worked do ... 9. 546 



Mean weight of clean cane per cell pounds. . 323 



Trash, per cent topped cane 10. 8 



Juice analytic*. 



Normal Diffusion 

 juice. juice. 



DegreeBrix 18.35 11.31 



Sucrose percent.. 12.78 8.28 



Glucose do .87 .58 



Purity coefficient 69.60 73.20 



Glucose, per cent sucrose 6. 84 7. 07 



Exhausted chips. 



Sucrose lost in exhausted chips, per cent cane, 0.60 (mean of eight analyses). 



Sirups. ] 



Degree Brix 



Sucrose per cent. . 



Glucose do 



Purity coefficient 



Glucose per cent sucrose 



A. 



54.50 

 38.70 



2.94 

 71.10 



7.61 



15. 



28.00 

 22. 07 



1.45 

 78.60 



6.57 



1 A, sirup before alcohol treatment; B, after treatment. 



Corrected for samples and skimmings. 



t Fifty pounds deducted for sugar added. 



