UNIO. 



29 



. 



H 

 ^ 



c 



c 

 



TRIANGULAR. 



J/y/rt pinna. Eat. 

 M;/a ;/racilis. Eat. 

 Afetaptera gracilis. Stimpson. (Agass. 

 MSS.) 



OVAL. 



*generosus. Gould.* Blan. 



OBLONG. 



*pressus. s Lea. 



Symph. compressa. Lea. 

 Cornplanaria alasmodontina. 3 Stimp- 

 son. (Agass. MSS.) 

 ' Unio compressus. Con. Adams.* 

 Linsley. DeJcay. Han. 



*decoratus. Lea. 



QUADRATE. 



*atromarginatus. Lea. Chenu. 



*multiplicatus. 5 Lea. Kirt. Potier. 



Chenu. Han. 



Unio hews. Say, in Disseminator. 

 Unio undulatus. Say, Am. Conch. 

 No. 2, PI. 16, Deshayes. 



QUADRATE. 



Unio heros. Say, Am. Conch. No. 6. 



Con. 

 Unio atrocostatus. Reeve, No. 13. 



*Eightsii. Lea. 

 *Neislerii. Lea. 



*undulatus. Bar. Valen. Hild. Desh. 



Chenu. Han. 

 Unio costataf Raf. 

 Unio costatus. Con. 

 Unio plicatus. Con. 

 Mya undulata. Eat. 



*perplicatus. Con. 



Unio Pearlensis. Con. 



*atrocostatus. Lea. 

 *Elliottii. Lea. 



1 l>r. Gould (Boston Nat. Hist. Soc., April, 1847) says it resembles Margaritana Vondembushiana, 

 Lea, now transferred to Monocondylcea, D'Orb. 



2 In the Proceedings of the Am. Phil. Soc., vol. ii. p. 237, I changed compressus into pressus, the 

 former name having been used by Sowerby for a fossil species. 



3 Where did Barnes describe "Unio Alasmodontinus, Barnes," as quoted by Agassiz? 



4 "Fresh water and land shells of Vermont." His variety plebeius does not seem to me to differ. 

 My brother, T. G. Lea, stated to me that he thought the U. pressus properly belonged to the genus Mnr- 

 ijiiritana, and that the charged ovisacs were like those of M. complanata. In all the fifteen which he 

 found during several years, the ovisacs were charged. I have since examined a female, and find this 

 species has in the soft parts other characters like Margaritana, but not completely so, and having true 

 lateral teeth, it must be placed with Unio. 



5 When I described the multiplicatus in 1830, 1 had had several specimens for two or three year*, 

 and was not aware that Mr. Say had published a shell under the name of heros, which he subsequently 

 abandoned as the undulatus of Barnes; but in 1834 reclaimed as heros. The figure of Mr. Say in Ame- 

 rican Conch., pi. 16, is certainly not U. undulatus, Bar., as he supposed. It is undoubtedly my multtplt- 

 catus, as a comparison of the two figures will prove. Mr. Say refers to Barnes's fig., Am. JL of SeiVniv. 

 vol. vi. pi. 2, as being the same with this; but a comparison will show that they are not alike in outlino. 

 in folds, nor in the beaks. 



8 



