156 



D. 



Page. 



Desprez beets, analyses of, in groups of ten 145, 146, 147 



average results of _._ 130 



E. 



Edson, Mr. C. B., analytical work of 127 



Elite beets, analyses of, in groups of tan 144 



F. 



Fertilizer experiments 121 



G. 



Georgia, analyses of baets from 15 



notes on beets from 77 



H. 



Henry, Prof. W. A., letter from 90 



Huston, Prof. H. A., experiments conductad by 78 



I. 



Idaho, analyses of bests from 15 



notes on beets from 77 



Illinois, analyses of beets from 15 



notes on beets from ;_ . 78 



Indiana, analyses of beets from 17 



notes on beets from 78 



Indian Territory, analyses of baets from 19 



Iowa, abstracts from station bulletin 81 



analyses of beets from 19 



beets from, analyzed in Stata laboratory . . _ j 80 



notes on baets from 79 



K. 



Kansas, analyses of beets from 30 



experiments with beets at Sorghum Station, Sterling 82 



notes on bee ts from 82 



Kedzie, Dr. R. C., experiments conducted by 83 



Kentucky, analyses of beets from 32 



notes on beets from . 82 



Klein wanzlebener beets, average results of . 131, 132 



Kleinwanzlebener Elite b3ets, analyses of, in groups of tan 142, 144, 145, 148, 150 



onehundied 142 



Knaur baets, analyses of, in groups of ten 143,144, 149 



L. 



Ladd, Mr. E. F., analyses by . 86 



Lemaira beets, analyses of, in groups of ten 143, 144,146,149 



Letter of transmittal 5 



Lloyd, Prof. Rachel, experiments conducted by. 85 



