84 LITHOSIIM:. 



GENUS NEOCHERA. Hiibner: Verz. Schm., p. 173 (1816). 



375. Weochera eugenia. 



Phalana eugenia. Cramer : Pap. Exot, iv. 235, pi. 398, f. M (1782). 

 Neochera eugenia. Hiibner: Verz. Schm., p. 173 (1816;. 

 Walker: ii. 449 (1854). 



Butler: Trans. Ent. Soc., Lond., 1875, p. 328. 



P. Z. S., Lond., 1877, p. 150. 



P. Z. S., Lond., 1879, p. 162. 



Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent., 1888, p. 120. 



Aganais eugenia. Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent, 1879, p. 78. 

 a. Ternate (Wallace). b. Dorey (Wallace). c. Aru (2) 



(Wallace). d. Mysol (Wallace). e. Sumatra (Wallace). 



f. New Guinea (W 7 allace). 



376. TsTeochera marmorea. 



Hypsa (Euplocea) marmorea. Walker : vii. 1674 (1856). 



Neochera marmorea. Butler: Trans. Ent. Soc., Lond., 1875, p. 329. 



111. Typ. Lep. Het, B. M , v. p. 43 (<j only), 



pi. 87, f. 10 a (1881). 

 Cotes and Swinh. (part) : Cat. Moths of India, ii. 87. 



515 (1887). 

 Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent., 1888, p. 121. 



Type. Sylhet, in B. M. 

 a. Sylhet. 



377. Neochera butleri. n. sp. 



Hypsa (Neochera] dominia. Walker: ii. 448 (1854). 



Neochera marmorea. Moore (nee. Walker) : P. Z. S., Lond., 1867, p. 677. 



- P. Z. S., Lond., 1878, p. 847. 

 Butler : (? only), 111. Typ. Lep. Het., B. M., v. p. 43, 

 pi. 87. f. ii ? (1881). 



Cotes and Swinh. (part) : Cat. Moths of India, ii. 87. 



515 (1887). 

 Swinhoe : Trans. Ent. Soc., Lond., 1890, p. 180. 



a. Assam ($ 9 types) (Jenkins). b. Sylhet (2). c. India (2). 



d. Cambodia Siam (2) (Mouhot). 



Walker's type of marmorea from Sylhet is perfectly distinct from 

 the common pale insect with white hind-wings, which has heretofore 

 been wrongly identified as N. marmorea. Walker's type is recorded 

 by him as being a female from Sylhet, but is a male, and is well 

 described and figured by Butler in 111. Typ., v. p. 43, pi. 87, f. 10. 

 There are both sexes in the B. M. collection, and there is a female in 

 this collection identical with the type also from Sylhet, and with a label 

 ' marmorea ' on it in Walker's own handwriting. Of the common and 

 perfectly distinct form which I have named after Mr. Butler there 

 are excellent series of both sexes in both the British and Oxford 

 Museums. Walker's description of marmorea^ though incomplete, 

 is quite sufficient to identify the type by, * the head black with white 

 bands is in itself quite sufficient ; I have examined the type and the 



