212 



Thax. Mem. Am. Acad. 12 : 296. d. pi. 5,7. 77-29. Dec. 1896. 

 Lindau in Engler & Prantl, Pflanzemfam. I 1 : 501. /. 291 C. April 1897. 

 Sacc. & Syd. Syll. 14 : 728. d. 20 Aug. 1899. 

 Ricker, Univ. of Maine Studies 3 : 41. 30 April 1902. 



Amorphomyces Floridanus, Thax. 

 See Diolcomyces Floridanus, Thax. 



Ampelomyces quisqualis, Ces. 



NOTE. The name Ampelomyces quisqualis, Ces. given in Klotzsch Herb. 

 Viv. Myc. 7669. 1852 and also in Bot. Zeit. 10; 301. 23 April 1852 

 certainly antedates Cicinnobolus, Ehrb. which did not appear until the 

 following year (Bot. Zeit. n : 16. 7 Jan. 1853) and then in a very vague 

 way. 



The true structure and position of the genus Cicinnobolus were first given 

 by De Bary in Beitr. Morph. und Phys. der Pilze 3: 53-75. //. //, 12. 1870 

 where he called the species Cicinnobolus Cesatii. In our opinion the name 

 Cicinnobolus Cesatii, D By. is the name which should be preferred to any 

 other but we do not agree with De Bary in referring the genus to Ehrenbcrg 

 but consider that he is himself the real author of the genus. 



Griffiths, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club. 26 : 184, 186. d. pi. 358. 12 April 1809. 



Underw. Moulds 232. pi. 5,f. 3. 1899. 



Nelson, Rept. Wyo. Exp. Sta. 10: (29). 1900. 

 *Griffiths, West Am. Fung. 7^2, /jj, i^ a . 22 March 1902. 

 Cicinnobolus Cesatii, D By. 



Hark. Bull. Cal. Acad. 1 : 258 (3). 19 Nov. 1885. 



Burrill & Earle, Bull. 111. Lab. 2 : 390, 391.7. 2. July 1887. 



Halsted, Bull. Iowa Agr. Coll. 1888: no. April 1888. 



Pammel, Jour. Myc. 4 : 38. d. May 1888. 



Scribner, Rent. U. S. Agr. 1887: 375, 378, 395. pi. i/,f. 2. 1888. 



Kellerm. & Swingle, Rept. Kans. Exp. Sta. 1 : 312. d. Feb. 1889. 



Gall. Rept. U. S. Agr. 1888 : 355. d. pi. 7,7 6. 1889. 



Anderson, Jour. Myc. 5 : 84. June 1889, 

 *Seymour & Earle, E. F. 745. i Sept. 1892. 



Underw. Proc. Ind. Acad. 1893 : 43. Aug. 1894. 

 *EII. & Ev. Fung. Columb. 960. April 1896. 

 *E1I. & Ev. N. A. F. 3445. 10 Dec. 1896. 



Stevens, F. L., Rept. Ohio Acad. 4 : 21. 1896. 



Pammel & Carver, Proc. Iowa Acad. 3 : 146. 1896. 



Atk. Bull. Cornell Univ. 3 : 29. 25 June 1897. 



Underw. & Earle, Bull. Ala. Exp. Sta. 80: 163. 28 June 1897. 



Stevens, F. L., Rept. Ohio Acad. 5: 64. 1897. 



Orton, Rept. Vt. Exp. Sta. 11 : 205. Sept. 1898 and Contr. Bot. Vt. 

 2: 7- Sept. 1898. 



Brannon, Proc. Ind. Acad. 1898: 293. Dec. 1899. 



Orton, Rept. Vt. Exp. Sta. 12: 172. Dec. 1899 and Contr. Bot. Vt 

 7:' 172. Dec. 1899. 



Patterson, Bull. U. S. Agr. PI. Industry 8: 23. 3 Feb. 1902. 

 *Barthol. Ell. & Ev. Fung. Columb. 7*75. 28 Dec. 1903. 



Amphiphytum, S. 



NOTE. Where this genus was described and whether it is a North Ameri- 

 can genus we are unable to ascertain. It is referred to in the citations given 

 below and also in Reichenbach, Conspect. Reg. Veg. 1828 as a doubtful 

 genus but we have been unable to trace the name in Schweinitz, the author 

 designated by Endlicher and Corda. 



Endl. Gen. PI. 35. 1840. 

 Cda. Icon. 5 : 44. 1842. 



