234 



Anthostomella smilaoinina, (Pk.) Sacc. 



Sacc. Syll. 1 : 281. d. 13 June 1882. 



Cke. Grev. 18 : 28. Dec. 1889. 



Ell. & Ev. Pyren. 419. d. May 1892. 

 Sphaeria smilaclnlna, Pk. 



Pk. Rept. N. Y. Mus. 29 : 62. d. 1878. 

 Anthostomella Sphserotheca, Earle. 



Earle, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 25 : 360. d. 15 July 1898. 



Earle in Mohr, Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 6 : 177. 31 July 1901. 



Sacc. & Syd. Syll. 16 : 440. d. i Feb. 1902. 



Anthostomella suberumpens, Ell. & Ev. 

 Ell. & Ev. Proc. Phil. Acad. 1894: 338. d. 30 Nov. 1894. 

 Sacc. Syll. 11 : 282. d. July 1895. 



Lindau in Engler & Prantl. Pflanzenfam. I 1 : 452. Feb. 1897. 

 Smyth, Tr. Kans. Acad. 15 : 67. March 1898. 



Anthostomella thyridioides, Ell. & Ev. 

 Ell. & Ev. Jour. Myc. 9 : 167. d. 29 Oct. 1903. 

 Sacc. Syll. 17 : 595. d. 25 May 1905. 



Anthracoldea, Bref. 



See Clntractla, Cornu. 



Anthracoldea Cartels, Bref. 



See Clntractla Cartels, (P.) Magn. 



Anthracoldea sublnclusa, Bref. 



See Cintractia sublnclusa, (Koern.) Magn. 



Anthracophyllum Nigrita, (Lev.) Kalchb. 



NOTE. The genus Anthracophyllum is by some recent writers kept distinct 

 from Xerotus but it is considered by Patouillard, Essai Tax. 146. 1900, to be 

 merely a subgenus of Xerotus. If kept distinct it is not easy to state what 

 are the generic characters. Hennings in Engler and Prantl, Pflanzenfam. 

 i 1 **: 222. 1898 makes a distinction on the spores which in Anthraco- 

 phyllum are said to be black and in Xerotus colorless; but according to 

 Patouillard the spores in both cases are colorless. 



Although we have never seen living material, in all the herbarium material 

 which we have seen of Xerotus Nigrita, the type of Anthracophyllum, the 

 spores were certainly not black nor even opaque. The generic distinction 

 founded on the relative position of the stipe and pileus hardly seems to be 

 of importance in this case as there are so many transitional stages. It 

 seems to us better then to retain the name Xerotus Nlgrtta, Lev., q. v. 



Anthurus borealis, Hurt. 



NOTE. The differences between the genera Anthurus and Lysurus are 

 certainly slight and the variety Klitzingii, Henn. of Anthurus borealis is by 

 him placed in the genus Lysurus in Hedw. Beibl. 41 : (173). Oct. 1902. 



Burt, Mem. Boston Soc. 3 : 487-505. d. pi. 49, J. 1-14. pi. 50, f. 15-'$, 



20-2^. Oct. 1894. 

 Sacc. Syll. 11 : 155. d. July 189";. 

 Burt, Bot. Gaz. 22 : 284. 20 Oct. 1896. 

 Burt, Bot. Gaz. 22 : 390. d. 23 Nov. 1896. 

 Pk. Rept. N. Y. Mus. 49 : 35 (21). 5 Nov. 1897. 

 Pk. Rept. N. Y. Mus. 50 : 132. 28 March 1898. 

 Fischer, E., in Engler & Prantl, Pflanzenfam. I 1 **: 288. d.f. 136 A-D. 



Sept. 1898. 



Griffiths, Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 26 : 628. /. 22 Dec. 1899. 

 Underw. Moulds 133. 1899. 

 Fischer, E., Neue Denkschr. Schweiz. Ges. 36 3 : 41. d. 1900. 



