748 APPENDIX B 



Sunday after Michaelmas 1304 [sic], the " chiualer " confesses he took 

 such a ship in that year but not of the value named : " ains fu prise 

 la dite Nief a la Suyne a la pointe du Jour oue poei- des enemy s as 

 Ancres." He seized it rightfully, the said ship consorting with the 

 enemies of France. The crew were taken, without force, and letters 

 were found in the ship to those of Bruges concerning money to be 

 received in that town ; those put in prison all escaped except Johan 

 de Masworth, who is still there. The " chiualer " deems both persons 

 and goods forfeit to the King of France. 



To the demand of John de Masworth for restoration of goods and 

 liberty, the " chiualer " says he is in prison as a malefactor against the 

 King of France, and that the commission of the deputies does not 

 extend to such cases. 



ADAM DE FULHAM against JOHN PAYDROGE. 

 LIBEL. 



Adam de Fulham of London complains that in the year 1302 men 

 of Calais attacked the "Margarete de Jernemuth" off Orfordenessh 

 going to London, killed the crew, and took the ship and goods to the 

 value of 20 to Calais and there disposed of them. Demands restora- 

 tion and damages. 



DENIAL. 



To the demand made by Adam de Fulham against said John and 

 others touching violence done to him between "le Seint Martin et 

 le Chaundeler" in 1302, said John replies as he did to Johan de 

 Chelchethe. 



EXCEPTION REQUIRING DELAY. 



To another demand of said Adam, said John replies as he did to 

 William Seruat. 



JOHN DE CHELCHETHE against EHYNER DE GRYMAUS. 

 LIBEL. 



John de Chelchethe of London complains that in 1302 John 

 Padrogh and others of Calais attacked the "Margarete de Jernemuth" 

 off Orfordenessh, killed the crew, and took ship and goods to Calais. 

 Demands restoration and damages, value in all 39, 5s. 8d. 



EXCEPTION REQUIRING DELAY. 



Said John Padrogh replies as he did to William Seruat. 



