796 



INDEX 



579, 641, 652, 659, 661, 666, 669 and n. ; 

 of true boundary of, 539 ; Scottish 

 firths, 692 ; statutes referring to, 589- 

 594 



Territorial sea, usage in seventeenth cen- 

 tury. 552 ; in eighteenth, 566 ; modern, 

 650 



Territorial sea, modern usage, Algeria, 

 657 ; Argentine Republic, wide claim 

 by, 661, 662, 663 ; in Rio de la Plata, 

 663 ; Austria - Hungary, 572, 658 ; in 

 Behriug Sea, 585, 695 and 11., 696; 

 Belgium, 658 ; Chili, 661 ; Cuba, 665 ; 

 Denmark, 528, 529, 530, 538, 567, 568, 

 653, 655, 664 ; in Cattegat, 653 ; Ice- 

 land and Faroes, 647, 648 ; Skagerrack, 

 636, 653 ; France, 657 ; Germany, 652 ; 

 Great Britain, origin of, 538 ; in Bristol 

 Channel, 586-588 ; at Bell Rock, 642 ; at 

 Eddy stone, 641, 642, 643: at Seven Stones 

 Rocks, 642, 643 ; British colonies, 661 ; 

 British N. America, 531 ; Greece, 661 ; 

 Italy, 659 ; Japan, 661 ; Netherlands, 

 658 ; in Zuiderzee, 635, 636 ; Norway, 

 457, 528, 538, 568, 653, 664, 669-681, 

 685 ; method of measuring, 669, 670, 

 685 ; rejects three-mile limit, 633, 636, 

 678, 681 ; reasons for wide limit, 676, 

 677 ; in Varangerfjord, 674 ; in Vest- 

 fjord, Lofotens, 672-674, 677 ; special 

 limits in, 671, 672, 678, 679 ; Portugal, 

 538, 569, 664, 668 ; Russia, 656 ; White 

 Sea, 564, 657 : Scandinavian limit, 528, 

 5*7 and n., 653, 655; Spain, 538, 569, 

 664-6R8 ; South America, 661 ; Sweden, 

 538, 653, 664, 669, 674, 675 ; method of 

 computing in, 669 ; United States, 661 ; 

 various limits claimed by, 575 ; Uru- 

 guay, 663 ; Venice, 571 



Territorial sea, opinions of publicists in 

 first part eighteenth century on, 565, 

 566 ; of recent publicists, 603, 605, 681, 

 688, 689 



Territorial sea, opinions of Abreu y Ber- 

 todano, 559 ; Aschehoug, 686, 688 ; 

 Aulier, 691 ; Azuni, 564, 565 ; on Bays, 

 565 ; Bishop, 683, 689 ; Bluntschli, 682, 

 688 ; Bodin, 540 ; Burgus, 550 ; Bynker- 

 shoek, 555, 556 ; on range of vision, 546 ; 

 Calvo, 682, 688 ; Casaregi, 558 ; Lord 

 Chelmsford, 586; Chitty, 597; Con- 

 ringius, 550 ; Baron de Courcel, 664 n. ; 

 Craig, 357 ; Dana, 683, 689 ; Desjardins, 

 685, 688 ; Lord Dunedin, 724 ; Fergu- 

 son, 684, 689; Fiore, 684, 689; Lord 

 Fitzmaurice, 630, 730, 731 ; Galiani, 

 5H3 ; Gentilis, 540 ; Graswinckel, 550 ; 

 Sir Edward Grey, 732 ; Grotius, 549 ; 

 on range of vision, 545 ; Lord Guthrie, 

 723; Chief -Justice Hale, 543; Hall, 

 687, 689 ; Halleck, 683, 689 ; Lord Hals- 

 bury, 592 ; Lord Hatherly, 586 n. ; 

 Hautefeuille, 601, 688; Heffter, 600, 

 689; Lord Herschell, 692 n.; Holland, 

 691 ; Hiibner, 562 ; Kent, 599, 689 ; 

 Kleen, 685; Kliiber, 597, 688; Lord 



Kyllachy, 725 ; Lampredi, 563 ; Latour, 

 595, 685 ; Lawrence, 683, 688 ; Leoni 

 Levi, 664 n. ; Loccenius, 550 ; Lord 

 Loreburn, 732 ; Lushington, 586 n. ; 

 Manning, 600, 689 ; Masse, 602, 688 ; 

 de Martens, 686, 688; G. F. von 

 Martens, 563 ; on bays, 564 ; on straits, 

 564 ; Moore, 691 n. ; Moser, 562 ; Sir 

 John Nicholl, 586 ; Oppenheim, 688 ; 

 Ortolan, 600, 688 ; Perels, 684, 688 ; 

 Phillimore. 682, 688, 689 ; Pistoye and 

 Duverdy, '602, 688; Pontanus, 550; 

 Pradier-Fodere, 684, 688; Puffendorf, 

 550 ; on bays and gulfs, 551 ; Rayneval, 

 596; Reddie, 600; Lord Salisbury, 

 592 ; Sarpi, 547 ; Schmalz, 597, 688 ; 

 Shookius, 550 ; Lord Stowell, 641 n. ; 

 Strauchius, 550 ; Sir Travers Twiss, 683, 

 689, 691 n.; Valin, 562; Vattel, 560, 

 689 ; on bays, 561 ; on straits, 561 ; 

 Lord Wensleydale, 586 n.; Westlake, 

 691 u. ; Wheaton, 598, 689 ; Wolff, 559, 

 689 ; Woolsey, 683, 689 : opinions of 

 early English lawyers, 539 ; of early 

 Italian jurists, 539 ; of Institut de Droit 

 International, 689-692, 774; of Inter- 

 national Law Association, 689-692, 774 ; 

 of judges in Franconia case, 590 

 Territorial Sea. Various limits proposed 

 or adopted for different purposes : 



Three-mile limit, proposed by Galiani, 

 563 ; by Azuni, 565 ; introduced for 

 neutrality by United States, 573, 574 ; 

 introduced into English jurisprudence, 

 576, 577 ; originated in neutral rights, 

 694; applied to fisheries, 581; confusion 

 of, with range of guns, 591 and n., 598, 

 682, 683, 689 ; not equivalent to range 

 of guns, 21, 576 ; discussion on, 650- 

 652 ; generally adopted through influ- 

 ence of the United States and Great 

 Britain, 21, 681 ; an Anglo-American 

 doctrine, 681, 684 ; not generally ac- 

 cepted by publicists, 580, 680, 681, 688, 

 775 ; common adoption of, 21, 650 ; in 

 some international fishery conventions, 

 581, 612, 614, 617, 619, 621, 634, 635, 

 647, 649, 652; generally for fisheries, 

 616, 647, 663, 680; inadequacy of, 21, 

 604, 615, 617, 651, 679, 682, 683, 686, 

 687, 690, 693, 694, 707 and n. ; in rela- 

 tion to next great maritime war, 22 ; 

 British Government on, 730, 732 ; re- 

 fuses to recognise jurisdiction beyond 

 three miles, 663, 667 and n., 738 ; 

 wishes three-mile limit extended in war, 

 665 ; rejected by four European States, 

 664 ; refused by Norway, 633, 636, 678, 

 681 ; complex on Norwegian coast, 672, 

 676 



Four-mile limit, 653 ; five miles, 575, 

 665, 691, 698, 715 ; six miles, 559, 563, 

 565, 566, 575, 582, 605, 606, 664, 665, 690, 

 691, 694, 775 ; adopted by International 

 Law Association for Fisheries, 690, 775 ; 

 limit for Dutch on Scottish coast, 605, 



