22O 



Literature. 



N. 



i. NEGER, F. W. Beitrage zur Biologic cler Erysipheen. Flora 90, p. 221. 1902. 

 i. NEUMANN, R. Ueber die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Aecidien und Spermo- 

 gonien der Uredineen. Hedwigia, Vol. 33, p. 346. 1894. 



P. 



i. PFEFFER, W. Ueber chemotaktische Bewegungen von Bakterien, Flagellaten 

 und Volvocineen. Untersuch. Bot. Inst., Tubingen. Vol. 2, p. 582. 1888. 



i. PLOWRIGHT, C. B. The connexion of Wheat Mildew (Puccinia graminis Pers.) 

 with the Barberry Aecidium (Aecidium berberidis Gmel.) Card. Chron. 

 Ser. 2, Vol. 18, p, 231. 1882. 



Podisoma juni-peri and Roestelia lacerata. Ibid, p. 553. 



3. Reproduction of Heteroecious Uredines. Linn. Soc., London. Botany, 



Vol. 21, p. 368. 1884. 



4. On the Life-history of certain British Heteroecismal Uredines. Quart. 



Journ. Micro. Sci., Vol. 2$, p. 156. 1885. 



5. A Monograph of the British Uredineae and Ustilagineae. London, i! 



6. - Barberry and Wheat Mildew. Gar'd. Chron., Vol. 23, p. 45. 18 



i. PRAIN, D. Rust in Wheat in the Australian Colonies. Agric. Ledger No. i( 



Calcutta. 1897. 

 i. PRILLIEUX, E. Maladies des Plantes Agricoles. Pt. i, p. 242. Paris, 1895. 



R. 



i. RALPH, T. S. On the Aecidium affecting the Senedo vulgaris or Groundsel. 



Victorian Nat., Vol. 7, pp. 18, 19. 1890. 

 i. RATHAY, E. Untersuchungen ueber die Spermogonien der Rostpilze. Denkschrift 



d. K. Akad. d. Wiss, Wien, Vol. 46, p. 51. 1883. 

 i. RICHARDS, H. M. On some points in the development of Aecidia. Proc. 



Amer. Acad. Sci., Vol. 31, p. 255. 1895. 

 i. RODWAY, L. Tasmanian Fungi. Proc. Roy. Soc., Tasmania, pp. 142, 143. 



1897. 

 i. ROZE, M. E. Le Puccinia chrysanthemi. Bull. Soc. Myc. France, Vol. i6 r 



p. 88. 1900. 



S. 



1. SACCARDO, P. A. Sylloge Fungorum. Vols. 7, 9, n, 14, 16, 17 1888-1905. 



2. Mycetes aliquot australiensis. Hedw., Vol. 28, p. 126. 1889. 



3. Ibid. Bull. Soc. Myc. France, Vol. 5, p. 118. 1889. 



4. Ibid. Hedw., Vol. 29, p. 155. 1890. 



5. - Ibid. Hedw., Vol 31, p. 57. 1893. 



i. SACCARDO, P. A., and BERLESE, A. N. Fungi australiensis. Rev. Myc., Vol. 

 7, p. 93. 1885 



1. SALMON, E. S. Mycological Notes. Journ. Bot., Vol. 42, p. 184. 1904. 



2. Cultural Experiments with " Biologic Forms 1 ' of the Erysiphaceae. 



Phil. Trans., B., Vol. 197, p. 107. 1904. 



3. Cultural Experiments with the Barley Mildew, Erysi-phe graminis 



DC. Ann. Myc., Vol. 2, p. 88. 1904. 



1. SAPPIN-TROUFFY, P. La Pseudo-Fecondation chez les Uredinees el les pheno- 



menes qui s'y rattachent. Compt. rend., Vol. 116, p. 1304. 1893. 



2. Recherches histologiques sur la famille des Ur^dinees. Le Botaniste, 



Vol. 5, pp. 59-244. 1896-97. 



i. SHUTT, F. T. The effect of Rust on the Straw and Grain of Wheat. Not 



West Farmer, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 2oth Oct., 1904. 



i. SMITH, W. G. Diseases of Field and Garden Crops. London. 1884. 

 i. SMITH, R. E. The Water relation of Puccinia as-paragi. Bot. Gaz., Vol. 



p. 19. 1904. 

 i. SORAUER, P. Das. Verhalten des Getreiderostes in trockenen und nassen ]'< 



ren. Zeitschr. f. Pflanzenkr., Vol. 4, p. 121. 1894. 

 2. Die Predisposition der Pflanzen fur parasitare Krankheiten. Deuts 



Landwirts. Ges., Berlin. 1903. 



1. SYDOW, P. and H. Monographia Uredinearum. Vol. i. 1902-04. 



2. Neue und kritische Uredineen. Ann. Myc., Vol. i, p. 324. 1903. 



