NOMENCLATURE OF LEPIDOPTERA. 297 



42. Walsingham (Lord). 



" There can be no doubt about the publication of the Zjitrdge 

 and as to definition the arguments advanced in dealing with the 

 Tentamen are held to apply with even greater force in the case of 

 the Zutrdge for the figures were issued with the text ; at the same 

 time I am strongly of opinion that the quarto sheet known as the 

 Tentamen was issued with one of Hubner's quarto iconographic 

 works." 



[Vide Staudinger 35, Walsingham 38. Di/rra>it.'\ 



43. Meyrick (E.). 



" No ; I reject these also as being without definition." 



44. KiRBY (W. F.). 



" The genera of Hubner's Zutrdge will stand or fall on the 

 principles discussed in the first part of my reply to (3)" [= Kirby 

 28. Dnrj-ant^ 



45. Fernald (C. H.). 



" I am certainly in favour of accepting the genera of Hubner's 

 Ziit7'-dgey 



46. Smith (J. B.). 



"Yes : I accept the genera of the Ziitracge. In this work there 

 is at least a chance to make an identification. The species referred 

 to are figured, and as a rule well represented : hence external form 

 and habitus at least are described, and quite frequently character- 

 istic bits of information are given in the side view. This work, to 

 my mind, stands on an entirely different plane as compared with 

 the Te7itamen, and comes within the requirements of the Code of 

 the Am. OrnitJi. Unions 



47. Snellen (P. C. T.). 15 Janjiary 1897. 



" Comme ces noms generiques ne sont non plus accompagnes de 

 descriptions, on ne peut jamais decider autrement qu'arbitraire- 

 ment dans quels cas ils devraient etre appliques pour d'autres 

 especes. lis ne sont done pas valables." 



48. AURIVILLIUS (C). 



" As ' nomina nuda ' to be rejected. Vide No. 3 " [= Auri- 

 villius 39. Durrant\ 



49. Staudinger (O.). 5 March 1897. 



" Sollten alle die Gattungsnamen ungultig sein, welche nicht 

 streng wissenschaftlich begriindet sind, so miissten sehr viele dieser 



