31 



In connection with these figures it is to be noted that they do not 

 as such give the results of the State's own forest management, the 

 expenses including such items as the cost of forestry education, the 

 expenses for the silvicultural Experimental Station, the surveillance 

 of the forests of the ecclesiastjpal fief -lands and of private individ- 

 uals, the purchase of land and other real estate, which can hardly 

 be regarded as ordinary expenses. The income from the various in- 

 spection districts for 1920 shows a profit per hectare of forest land 

 and arable land averaging 14: 23 marks for the whole country, this 

 varying in the different districts between 98: 30 marks (Inspection 

 District of Turku and Hame (Abo and Tavastehus) and 2: 44 marks 

 (Inspection District of Lapland). 



.Mill. mks. 

 Mil/, mk. 

 14 



MEN OT EXPENSES 



TULOT INCOME 



A AS TO SAVING 



1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 192! 



Fig. 8. 

 Financial results obtained by Board of Forestry. 



Communal and Private Forests and Their Management. 



The Ecclesiastical Fief-lands. 



The ecclesiastical fief -lands are in a way endowments, the pro- 

 ceeds of which are to be used by the parishes for ecclesiastical pur- 

 poses. The products of their forests satisfy in the first place the 

 demands of the vicarages and of the estates of other Church officials. 



