NO. I 
NATIVES OF KHARGA OASIS HRDLICKA 
This condition is expressed not only by the averages, but is also 
illustrated by the fact that in the series of the lowest heads there 
are no instances of a cephalic module higher than 15.2, while in the 
series of highest heads there is no module lower than 15.3. 
It is further found, however, that in the case of the lowest heads, 
the average height of the head corresponds to the average cephalic 
module of the same heads only in the proportion of 84.1 to 100, 
while in the case of the highest heads that proportion is as 87.6 to 
loo. This indicates that the height of the head increases faster than 
the size of the head as a whole, and hence to some extent indepen- 
dently of the same. 
As to the relation of the height of the head to the length and 
breadth of the same, the following data show conclusively that the 
highest heads are also as a rule absolutely longer and broader than 
the lowest ones. Under normal conditions, therefore, an exceptional 
cephalic height is largely a function of the size of the head (which, 
in turn, as brought out before, stands in close connection with the 
stature). 
KHAKGA OASIS, MEN: RELATION OF HEIGHT OF HEAD TO LENGTH AND 
BREADTH OF SAME 
Cases with smallest height of head 
(12.65 cm - an d below) 
Cases with greatest height of head 
(13.7 cm. and above.) 
Height of head 
Length of head 
Breadth of head 
Height of head 
Length of head 
Breadth of head 
cm. 
cm. 
cm. 
cm. 
cm. 
cm. 
12.30 
18.6 
I4.I 
13.70 
19.2 
14.1 
12.30 
18.2 
12.8 
13.70 
19.2 
14.4 
12.35 
18.7 
13.4 
13.70 
18.6 
14.4 
12.50 
18.0 
I4.O 
13.70 
20.0 
14.7 
12.50 
18.5 
13-6 
13-75 
19-3 
14.2 
12.55 
18.5 
13-4 
13.80 
I9.I 
14.2 
12.55 
12.60 
19.2 
17.8 
I3.I 
14.0 
13.80 
13.80 
18.6 
19.4 
14.9 
13.9 
12.60 
18.8 
14.2 
13.80 
18.8 
14.4 
12.65 
18.6 
13.6 
13-85 
19.0 
14.2 
12.65 
19.0 
13.7 
13.90 
18.5 
13.6 
12.65 
18.7 
14.4 
14.10 
19.8 
14.4 
12.65 
18.3 
14.2 
14.15 
19-9 
14.5 
Averages (13 cases): 
Averages (13 cases): 
12.53 
18.53 
13.73 
13.83 
19.18 
14.30 
Percental rela- 
tion of height 
to length and 
breadth 
67.6 
91.3 
.... 
72.1 
96.7 
