364 CARNIVORES. 



" The most likely places in the bush coiuitiy in which to find lions," observes Mr. 

 Drummond, " as far as my experience goes, are the rekabee thorns, the dense 

 evei'greens which line the rivers, and, during summer, the reeds on the margins of 

 lagoons or streams, while in the open flats any patch of reeds or tall grass suffices 

 to conceal them. The best chances for killing them are obtained in the first- 

 mentioned spots, as you often come across them asleep when you are stealing about 

 after game." From these and similar haunts, the lion issues forth at sundown to 

 commence his nightly prowls ; dark and stormy nights, according to Gordon 

 Gumming, being those on which he is most active, while he is more cautious during 

 bright moonlight nights, especially as regards his visits to the drinking-places. 



Unlike most of his congeners, the lion is not a climber, and this general 

 inability to ascend trees has saved the lives of many sportsmen and travellers, 

 although not unfrequently at the cost of a long and thii-sty waiting. 



Mr. Blanford, who has had the opportunity of observing both lions and tigers 

 in their native haunts, is of opinion that the former are bolder than the lattei-, 

 while they are certainly far more noisj^ When relating the results of his experi- 

 ences during the Abj-ssinian Expedition, he observes that " the first peculiarity 

 that struck me in the African lions was their noisiness. I have constantly been 

 for months together in countries in India abounding in tigers without hearing their 

 cry. Indeed, it is bj" no means a common sound in any Indian forest. Leopards, 

 I should say, are much more frequently heard than tigers. Tlie crj' of the two 

 animals, common]}' known as roaring, though it is utterly different from the hareh 

 growl of auger to which tlie tenn might most appropriately be applied, is very 

 similar, and consists of several deep notes uttered rather quickly one after the 

 other, and repeated at longer and shorter intervals." 



Very different impressions appear to be produced on different persons by the 

 lion's roar, some listeners appearing to regard it as a i-ather commonplace and by no 

 means awe-inspiring sound, while otliers, and we believe the majoritj', speak of it 

 in far different terms. Such differences of impression must, it is obvious, be lai-gely 

 due to personal disposition. 



Perhaps the lowest estimation of the lion's roar is that of Livingstone. He 

 writes that " it is calculated to inspire fear when heard in a pitchj' dark night 

 amidst the tremendous peals of an African thunderstorm, and the vivid flashes of 

 lightning wliich leave on the eye the impression of stone-blindness, while the rain 

 pouring down extinguishes the fire, and there is neither the pi'otection of a tree nor 

 a chance that vour g\ni will go off'. But wlien anvone is snug in a house or a 

 waggon, the roar of the lion inspires no awe. A European cannot distinguish 

 between tlie note of a lion and that of an ostrich. In general tlie voice of the 

 former seems to come deeper from the chest ; but to tliis day I can only pronounce 

 with certainty from which of the two it proceeds, by knowing that the ostrich 

 roai-s by daj' and tlie lion bj- night. The natives assert that they can detect a 

 difference at the beginning of the sound." 



A recent writer in Land atul Water, who is fully impressed witli the gi-andeur 

 of the lion's roar, is bj' no means di.sposed to admit the justness of its comparison to 

 the voice of the ostrich. He observes that when a lion is " roaring loudh* in concert 

 with othei"s at a short distance off", the sound is grand and awe-inspiring in the 



