ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. 371 



work, mentions Pupa Humph., Mus. Calonnianum (a nomen 

 nudum), and Pupa Drapamaud. Deloplecta will be consid- 

 ered equivalent to the latter, with the same type, Pupa fru~ 

 mentum. Agassiz gives the reference "Charp., Cat. Moll. 

 Suisse, 1837, ' ' but the name does not occur in that work. 



Pupella SWAINSON, Treatise on Malacology, 1840, pp. 183, 

 334 (P. variabttis here designated as type). Not Pupetta 

 B. St. Vincent, 1825 (Infusoria). 



PAGE 264. Under the caption "Radula", the reference to 

 Proc. Malac. Soc. London should be Vol. II. 



PAGE 307, tenth line from bottom, for "Bull. Soc. d'Agric." 

 read: Ann. Soc. d'Agric. The same correction should be 

 made on pp. 311 and 314. 



"PUPA" PYRENAICA Boubee. r 



Pupa hospitii (p. 37) is said to be a synonym of Pupa* 

 (ModiceUa) pyrenaica Boubee (B., H. & d'A-A., Fauna Mala- 

 cologia del Pirineu Catala, i, 1818, p. 99). The writer has 

 not seen Boubee 's publication. According to Westerlund,. 

 Clausitia pyrenaica Boubee 1833 is identical with Pupa 

 pyren&aria (Boub.) Mich., and P. pyrenaica Boubee 1839 is 

 P. ring em (Calliaud) Mich. It is evidently Abida "pyrena- 

 aria" which Bofill, Haas and d'Aguilar-Amat had in view. 

 See Man. Conch. XXIV, pp. 278, 288. The status of Bou- 

 bee 's species must be determined by reference to the original 

 publication. 



VOLUME XXV. 



CHONDRINA GONIOSTOMA (Kiister). P. 33. Bofill, Haas and 

 d'Aguilar-Amat consider Pupa angulata Fagot (p. 34) to be 

 one extreme of this species, P. leptocheilos Fagot (p. 31) the 

 other, the first having the mouth more angular, the second 

 less so (Fauna Malacologia del Pirineu Catala, i, 1918, p. 95). 

 As stated in the text, P. leptocheilos was proposed as a sub- 

 stitute for tenuimarginata. 



