RUI1AL AND AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION 39 



r(vi)=.709 

 r(vi) :e==.443 

 r(vi) :n=.404 



r(fm)=.848 r(k)=.677 r(fc)=.472 



r(fm) :i=.649 r(fk) :i=.430 r(fc) :i=.163 



f(fb)=.801 r(fn)=700 r(fp)=.354 



r(fb) :i=.5SS r(fn) :i=.351 r(fp) :i=.198 



r(fe)=.514 

 r(fc):i= .047 



Native intelligence correlates in order of value with the 

 other factors as follows : (See Table III) 



1. Management 5. Community value 



2. Business 6. Skills 



3. Education 7. Mechanical ability 



4. Information 8. Physical capacity. 



In its relation to financial success native intelligence is 

 affected by eliminating other qualities in order as follows : 



1. Business 4. Mechanical ability 



2. Information 5. Physical capacity 



3. Education 



In its relation to community value it is more affected by 

 the elimination of information than by the elimination of edu- 

 cation. 



Again successively eliminating intelligence from the rela- 

 tion between financial success and the remaining qualities, it is 

 seen to affect the financial -education relationship much more 

 vitally than e. g. the financial-management relationship. 



It would seem that we could draw the conclusion from the 

 above that native intelligence as defined on page 8 is a very 

 vital, causal factor conditioning manager- 

 Native intelligence ial ability and business ability and techni- 

 seems to be a vital cal information. The importance of this 

 factor conditioning fact in working out methods of training 

 success. and in vocational direction can scarcely be 



over-estimated. 



