109 Domesday and Feudal Statistics 



Duke before which he had feft to the extent of 1 1 5 fees 

 miiuJry 5 ['<& his son's charter 1166] likewise before the 

 service. death of said Roger, his son in law (the said Wm.), 

 had of the gift of Hen. I., 15 and 10 fees already 

 subinfeuded \_vide his son's charter 1166]; in 

 addition Florence of Worcester (1086) uses the 

 expresssion, quot feudatos milites, referring to D. B., 

 and tho' that valuable record is no Feodary, it 

 gives the information the chronicler records, tho' 

 not in so ample a manner, as would occur in a 

 specific return of Knight Service. 



The Exon. D. B. ; the I. C. C., and /. E. (ed. 



Hamilton), in conjunction with D. B. set early 



feudal tenure in a clearer aspect : in the latter 



Subin- [/. ., presumably /. Wm. I., and almost certainly 



/ eu w^ i0 /.' nth cent.], amongst the list of ploughs (p. 168, 



ed. Hamilton, and in all 3 of his originals), occurs 



the following [hitherto unnoticed, ut credd\, with 



reference to the vill of Teusham,^ Hoc tenet 



iohannes in feudo de abb ate fro duo bus mill ti bus. 



Another reference to military service occurs in 



Duke Will. Gemet., of the early nth century [accipiens 



Military s muncre comitatum ut inde exhiberet ei milit'uz statuta, 



Service. compare, in statuto servitio Milicie in the Charter 



of Hen. I., Lib. EL ///.], which (former) is cited 



more fully in The S outage and Knight Service of 



England.^ 



* Vide D. B., i. 191/2 and 201^, where the lordship of the 

 vill is divided between the Abbot of Ely and John^ Waleran, 

 perhaps the same tenant as in I. E., ut sup. 



f The reference to Wm. de Jumieges was made known to 

 writer by this work (J. F. Baldwin, Univ. Chicago Press, 1897), 

 which is well deserving the attention of all interested in the 



