152 CATALOGUE OF UNGULATES 



moderately tall, with a small additional column on the 

 inner side ; vorner not dividing aperture of posterior nostrils 

 into two chambers. Size large ; build heavy, with the limbs 

 stout. No foot-glands. 



Much difference of opinion has existed as to the systematic 

 position of this genus, which was regarded by Milne-Edwards 

 as a very distinct type ; the same view being maintained by 

 Gray, who placed Elapliurus between the roes and the 

 American deer. On the other hand, Sclater and Brooke 

 included Elapliurus in Cervus ; but Gordon Cameron, from 

 the form of the antlers, reverted to the older view ; while 

 Pocock, who regards the front prong of the antlers as 

 representing the brow-tine of Cervus, sides with Sclater and 

 Brooke, although maintaining Elaphurus as a distinct genus. 

 Garrod confessed his inability to identify the tines of the 

 antlers with those of other deer. 



The range is not definitely known, but seems to have 

 included some part of Northern China and, it is said, Japan. 

 The evidence in favour of the later country forming a part 

 of the distributional area rests on a fragment of an alleged 

 fossil antler described by Watase. 



ELAPHURUS DAVIDIANUS. 



Elaphurus davidianus, Milne-Edwards, Ann. Sci. Nat. ser. 5, vol. v, 

 p. 380, 1866, Arch. Mus. Paris, vol. ii, p. 27, 1866 ; Gray, Cat. 

 Buminants Brit. Mus. p. 82, 1872, Hand-List Ruminants Brit. 

 Mus. p. 154, 1873 ; Fitting er, Sitzber. 7c. Ak. Wiss. Wien, vol. Ixx, 

 pt. 1, p. 329, 1874; Garrod, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1877, p. 16; 

 LydeJcker, Deer of All Lands, p. 236, pi. xix, 1898, Proc. Zool. 

 Soc. 1901, vol. ii, p. 472, 1904, vol. ii, p. 178; Ward, Records of 

 Big Game, ed. 6, p. 101, 1910, ed. 7, p. 78, 1914; Pocock, Proc. 

 Zool. Soc. 1910, p. 945, 1912, p. 777 ; Watase, Zool Mag. Tokyo, 

 vol. xxv, p. 487, 1913. 



Cervus davidianus, Sclater, Trans. Zool. Soc. vol. vii, p. 331, 1871 ; 

 BrooJce, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1878 r p. 906 ; Ward, Records of Big 

 Game, ed. 2, p. 17, 1898; Flower and LydeJcker, Study of 

 Mammals, p. 320, 1891; LydekTcer, Horns and Hoofs, p. 309, 

 1913. 



MI-LU; PERE DAVID'S DEER. 



The distribution is the same as that of the species, which 

 is known only by the herd formerly kept in the gardens of 

 the Summer Palace, Pekin, and their descendants. 



