14 NEW-YORK FAUNA. 



long-tailed mole. Linneus, in his 12th edition, 1776, published his description of the Sorex 

 crislcitus. The following year, Erxleben gave the name of longicaudata to Pennant's mole. 

 We suppose that all these refer to the same species, Linneus liaving described from an 

 injured specimen. In the third edition of the Synopsis, (possibly in the second, wliich we 

 have not seen,) which was published under the title of the History of Quadrupeds, Pennant 

 introduces the Linnean cristatus, with a deplorable figure, and adds liis long-tailed mole 

 with a figure scarcely superior to the other. From his account, it is apparent that he 

 described an immature star-nose for the cristatus. In his Arctic Zoology, liaving in the 

 interval received specimens from this country, he describes some additional particulars ; of 

 these the most important diagnostic character attributed to the cristatus, is " toes of the hind 

 feet closely connected ;" and yet Desmarest, Op. cit. who has given a detailed description, 

 expressly states " Pieds de derriere, etc." " Hind feet with the toes deeply divided, all the 

 toes free ;" and tliis accords with our own observations. The account of the longicaudata by 

 Desmarest, is evidently copied from Pennant by some culpably careless transcriber. 



From these observations, we would infer, 1st, that the cristatus of Linneus is the only 

 species yet discovered in this country, and is identical with the long-tailed mole of Pennant ; 

 2d, that the name of cristatus is entitled to priority ; 3d, that if the name longicaudata ever 

 appears in the systems, it must be attributed to Erxleben, and not to Pennant. 



The C. macroura of Harlan, although adopted, described in detail and figured by Rich- 

 ardson, we cannot, after a careful comparison of descriptions, acknowledge to be a distinct 

 species. It is well known that the tail undergoes, at certain seasons, changes in shape and 

 bidk ; and species founded on such characters should be received with gi'cat reserve. We 

 have specimens of the common sUtr-nose differing in no respect from the macroura, except in 

 its tail not being qiiite as much dilated as in the figure of Richardson. It is proper, however, 

 to add, that we have not been enabled to examine the individual from which Dr. Harlan 

 drew up his description ; and his account purports to have been derived from a cabinet spe- 

 cimen. 



The Star-nose burrows in moist places near the surface, forming elevated ridges like the 

 Shrew-mole, and chambers for rearing their young. These are most numerous near the 

 - borders of streams. Wlien observed in confinement, they continually attempt to hide them- 

 selves by digging, and the cartilaginous tendrils around their nose are in perpetual motion. 

 Godman states that tiiey feed readily on flesh, either raw or cooked, and exhibit no willing- 

 ness to eat vegetable matter. 



The Star-nose is abundant throughout New- York, where it is occasionally called the 

 Button-nose Mole. Its geographic limits are not yet establislied. It is, however, known at 

 present to be found from Hudson's Bay to Virginia. 



