Chap. 6.] ACCOUNT OF THE WOELD. 25 



cannot do everything. For he cannot procure death for 

 himself, even if he wished it, which, so numerous are the 

 evils of life, has been granted to man as our chief good. Nor 

 can he make mortals immortal, or recall to life those who 

 are dead ; nor can he effect, that he who has once lived shall 

 not have lived, or that he who has enjoyed honours shall not 

 have enjoyed them ; nor has he any influence over past 

 events but to cause them to be forgotten. And, if we illus- 

 trate the nature of our connexion with God by a less serious 

 argument, he cannot make twice ten not to be twenty, and 

 many other things of this kind. By these considerations the 

 power of Nature is clearly proved, and is shown to be what 

 we call God. It is not foreign to the subject to have di- 

 ^ssed into these matters, familiar as they are to every one, 

 irom the continual discussions that take place respecting 

 God'. ^ 



CHAP. 6. (8.) — OF THE NATURE OF THE STAES ; OF THE 

 MOTION OF THE PLANETS. 



Let US return from this digression to the other p&rts 

 of nature. The stars which are described as fixed in the 

 heavens*, are not, as the vulgar suppose, attached each of 

 them to different individuals', the brighter to the rich, those 

 tliat are less so to the poor, and the dim to the aged, shining 

 according to the lot of the individual, and separately assigned 

 to mortals ; for they have neither come into existence, nor 



* It is scarcely necessary to remark, that the opinions here stated re- 

 specting the Deity are taken partly from the tenets of the Epicureans, 

 combined with the Stoical doctrine of Fate. The examples which are ad- 

 duced to prove the power of fate over the Deity are, for the most part, 

 rather verbal than essential. 



2 " afRxa mundo." The peculiar \ise of the word mundus in this pas- 

 sage is worthy of remark, in connexion with note \ ch. 1. page 13. 



* We have many references in Pliny to the influence of the stars upon 

 the earth and its inhabitants, constituting what was formerly regarded as 

 BO important a science, judicial astrology. Ptolemy has drawn up a 

 regular code of it in his "Centmn dicta," or " Ceiatiloquiums." We 

 have a liiglUy interesting account of the supposed science, its origin, pro- 

 gress, and general principles, in Whewell's History of the Inductive Sci- 

 ences, p. 293 et seq. I may also refer to the same work for a sketch of 

 the history of astronomy among the Greeks and the other nations of 

 antiquity. 



