INDEX, 



405 



Page. 



Irrigation districts 33, UO, 111, 113, 217, 236, 274, 399 



State aid tor, recommended 110,399 



Irrigation "head" 343 



Irrigation in California — 



opposition to 31 



present and future 25 



Irrigation investigations — 



continuation of , recommended 349,391 



scope 20 



should be conducted by State and Federal govern- 

 ments 322 



Irrigation law for California, commission to frame, 



should be appointed 350,395,399 



Island LaSe Reservoir 124 



Italy- 

 compared with California 29 



Government ownership of canals 64 



issues licenses to water 37 



ownership of water 64 



Jack Ditch 286 



Jackson Lake Resenoir 124 



Jacobie Ditch 284 



James Canal '. 224,247,309 



James East Side Canal 312 



James West Side Canal 312 



Johnstonville, irrigation situation 93 



Kate Hays Ditch 144 



Kelsey, F.F.S., assistance of, acknowledged 5 



Kern Lake, evaporation from (note) 75 



Kings Canal 304 



Kings River — 



canal systems 282 



claims to water 269 



contributions for investigations on, from California 



Water and Forest Association 6 



description and watershed 260 



evaporation experiments 323 



flow 267 



irrigation development 259 



irrigation practice 314 



report on, by C. E. Grunsky 259 



settlement of water right by mutual agreement . . 317 



storage 269 



Kings River and Fresno Canal 286 



Kings River and Fresno Canal and Irrigation Com- 

 pany, litigation affecting 58 



Kings River district, rainfall and climate 266 



Laguna de Tache Canal 308,309 



Laguna de Tache Rancho, canal system 308 



Lake district. Honey Lake Valley — 



adjudication of water rights 95 



claims to water 87,88 



Lake Fordyce — 



depth of snow, diagram 123 



evaporation 126 



precipitation, diagram 122 



Lake Fordyce Reservoir 124,140 



Lake Leavitt district — 



irrigation situation 94 



storage 78 



Lake Spaulding Reservoir 123,124,140 



Lake Spencer ; 125 



Land — 



a public utility 64 



acquirement of, under Carey law, Wyoming 109 



value of, in Browns Valley 135 



value of, on South Yuba 152 



Land, irrigated, value of — Page. 



American River 27 



Cottonwood Creek, Utah 31 



San Joaquin Valley 218 



southern California 25 



Land values, effect of irrigation on 2M 



Landlordism, in Sacramento Valley 31 



Large enterprises, desire for, California 32 



La^t Chance Ditch 300 



litigation affecting 59,60,61 



Lease of water, allowed under riparian doctrine 47 



Legislation, recommendations regarding, agreed to by 



investigators 65,396 



Leinberger Slough 301 



Liberty Canal 305 



License to water, Italy 37 



Lippincott. J. B 355 



Litigation — 



Cache Creek— 



Cacheville Agricultural Ditch Company v. 



James Moore 176 



Moore r. Capay and Adams Ditch companies. . 180 

 Woodland Ditch Company r. Clear Lake Water 



Company 178 



forced upon water users 62,323 



Honey Lake Valley 91 



Kings River 68 



court adjudications 277 



discussion 6,27,282 



Los Angeles River — 



City of Los .\ngeles f. Baldwin 336 



City of Los Angeles V. Crystal Springs Land and 



Water Company 342 



City of Los Angeles r. Pomeroy 340 



City of Los Angeles r. West Los Angeles Water 



Company 342 



Elmsf. City of Los Angeles 339 



Feiiz f. City of Los Angeles 337 



Los iVngeles Water Company v. City of Los An- 

 geles 337 



Vernon Irrigation Company v. City of Los An- 

 geles 339 



Salinas Valley — 



Burrows r. Burrows 205 



Green v. Carotta 204 



San Luis Water Company v. Estrada 206 



Smith)'. Corbit 205 



Zimmler v. San Luis Water Company 204 



San Joaquin River and tributaries — 



California Pastoral and Agricultural Company 



1-. Bliss etal 244 



Chapin v. Brown 238 



Goode V. San Joaquin Electric Company 244 



Hite r. Madera Canal and Irrigation Company. 245 



Howard r. Stitt 237 



Lowrj' r. San Joaquin and Kings River Canal 



and Irrigation Company 242 



Madera Canal and Irrigation Company 1;. 



Miller&Lux 243 



Madera Irrigation District 238 



Miller & Lux et al. f. Borland 242 



Miller & Lux et al r. Enterprise Canal Com- 

 pany 229 



Miller & Lux i'. Fresno Flume and Irrigation 



Company 238 



Ross V. Lawson 238 



Stevenson v. San Joaquin and Kings River 



Canal and Irrigation Company 245 



