102 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY 



17. ACROPHTHALMIA. 



1861. Feld., Wien. Ent. Monatschr. v. 305 [Acrophtalmia] : Arte- 

 mis. Sole species, and therefore type. 



1867. Ib., Reise Novara, 486 : corrects the name to Acrophthalmia, 

 and it is so used by Kirby. 



18. ACTINOTE. 



1816. Hubn., Verz. 27 : Thalia, Gea (Epaea), Euryta (Eurita), 



Amosis (Amesis). 

 1848. Doubl., Gen. Diurn. Lep. 142 : retains it for Thalia and seven 



others, placed in two sections. 

 1869. Butl., Cat. Fabr. Lep. 128 : employs it for Thalia only. 



Nevertheless Thalia cannot be designated as the type (see Calornis) ; 

 nor can Amosis, because it was placed in Alesa in 1847. Euryta may 

 be taken as the type. 



19. ACULHUA. 



1871. Kirb., Syn. Cat. Lep. 301 : Cinaron. Sole species, and there- 

 fore type. 

 The name is proposed in place of Dryas Feld., nee Boisd., nee Hiibn. 



20. ADELPHA. 



1816. Hiibn., Verz. 42: Mesentina, Basilea (basilis), Iphicla, Ple- 

 saure, Cocala, Cytherea (Elea, Cytherea), Phliasus 

 (Phliase). 



1865. Herr.-Schaeff., Prodr. i. 66 : employs it for Irmina and five 

 others, of which only Mesentina (Mesenteria) is mentioned 

 by Hiibrier. 



1871. Kirb., Syn. Cat. Lep. 230 : employs it for all the species men- 

 tioned by Hiibner and Herrich-Schaeffer, 'excepting the 

 last of Hiibner's, which is wrongly placed in this con- 

 nection. 

 Mesentina may be designated as type. 



21. ADOLTAS. 



1836. Boisd., Spec, gen., plates 3, 4 B. : Aconthea [larva only], 



Dirtea (Boisduvalii). 

 1844. Doubl., List Br. Mtis. 102 : places a number of species in the 



genus, among them Aconthea. 



