ADDITIONS-RECENT SPECIES. 251 



D. MULTISTRIATUM Deshayes. PI. 39, fig. 5. 



Small, narrow, generally but little curved, white, yellowish or 

 grayish ; entirely covered with fine, crowded striae, continuous from 

 base to apex. In some individuals these striae are a little wider, less 

 crowded, with a fine thread interposed ; but in the majority of shells 

 they are equal, rounded, sometimes quite regularly spotted with 

 gray or translucent white on an opaque white ground. Apex ordi- 

 narily worn, the striae often deeper than at the base ; aperture per- 

 ceptibly oblique, with very sharp peristome. Length 20, greatest 

 diam. 3 mill. (ZtesA.). 



Found with D. variabilis, and presumably from India. (Desh.). 



D. multistriatum DESHAYES, Mem. Soc. Hist. Nat. Paris, ii, p. 

 358, pi. 18, fig. 11. 



Apparently resembles some forms of D. antillarum. It is known 

 to us only from the above description and figure. 



D. CANDIDUM Jeffreys (p. 72). 



Off Marocco, Sahara and Canaries, 629-1,429 fms., 'Talisman' 

 Exp. (Jeffreys, P. Z. S., 1884, p. 147). 



D. CAPILLOSUM Jeffreys (p. 77). 



Off west coast of Africa and Azores, 681 to 2,711 fms., ' Talis- 

 man 'Exp. (Jeffreys, P. Z. S., 1884, p. 147). 



D. MAGNIFICUM E. A. Smith, (p. 78). 



Shell large, thick, moderately curved, perceptibly tapering pos- 

 teriorly, obliquely truncated anteriorly ; sculptured everywhere with 

 many delicate ribs crenulated by transverse striae ; slit narrow, of 

 varying length. Length 115, greatest diam. 15 mill. (Smith). 



Lat. 8 40' N., long. 81 27' 35" E., in 637-800 fms. ; off Trin- 

 comalee, east coast of Ceylon. 



Dentalium magnificum SMITH, Ann. Mag. N. H. (6), xviii, p. 371, 

 Nov., 1896. PILSBRY, this vol., p. 78. 



The description of this species was overlooked by me when the 

 MS. for part 65 of this volume was in preparation. Mr. Smith 

 writes : 



" This fine species is as large as the Japanese D. vernedei or the 

 fossil D. grande Desh. The form, however, is more rapidly taper- 

 ing than that of either, and the sculpture is not precisely similar ; 

 the aperture is larger than in either of the species quoted and almost 



