580 CORRECTIONS 



Western Hupeh: (No. 2720). 



No. 1703 from Kiangai belongs to A. heterophylla, but not to the var. 

 amurensis] it is possibly a new variety. 

 Parthenocissus Henryana (p. 101). Wilson's No. 440 does not belong here, but 

 is the type of the following species: 

 Parthenocissus laetevirens Rehder in Mitt, Deutsch. Dendr. Ges. XXI. 190 

 (1912). 

 Parthenocissus Henryana Gagnepain in Sargent, PI. Wilson. I. 101 (1911), 

 quoad specimen No. 440. 

 Western Hupeh: (No. 440, type; Veitch Exped. Nos. 1414, 1414^ in 

 part, flowering specimens only). 

 Parthenocissus himalayana, var. rubrifolia (p. 101). The synonym ParthenociS' 

 sus sinensis Diels & Gilg belongs to Vitis Piasezkii Maximo wicz. — Cf. 

 Rehder in Mitt. Deutsch. Dendr. Ges. XXI. 192 (1912). 

 Lonicera pileata (p. 135). Wilson's No. 883 enumerated under this species is the 

 type of the following species: 

 Lonicera nitida Wilson in Gard. Chron. ser. 3, L. 102 (1911). 



Lonicera pileata Rehder in Sargent, PI. Wilson. I. 135 (1911), quoad speci- 

 men No. 833. 

 Western Szech'uan: (No. 833). 

 Prunus pseudocerasus (p. 245). The Prunus pseudocerasus Lindley belongs to 

 the subsect. Ceraseidos Koehne, ser. Euceraseidos Koehne; the name P. 

 pseudocerasus as used in this work should be replaced by the following 

 name: 

 Prunus Sieboldii Wittmack in Gartenfl. LI. 272 (1902). — Cf . Koehne in Fedde, 

 Rep. Nov. Sp. XI. 267, 270 (1912) and in Mitt. Deutsch. Dendr. Ges. XXI. 

 182 (1912). 

 Prunus serrulata (p. 246). Instead of Prunus donarium Siebold read: Prunus 

 donarium Koidzumi in Tokyo Bot. Mag. XXV. 259 (1911).— Cf. Koehne 

 in Fedde, Rep. Nov. Sp. XI. 267 (1912). 

 Prunus Tschonoskii (p. 261). Add as a synonym: Prunus crassipes Koidzumi in 

 Tohjo Bot. Mag. XXV. 260 (1911). — Cf. Koehne in Fedde, Rep. Nov. 

 Sp. XI. 274 (1912). 

 Prunus trifiora (p. 276). Professor Koehne informed us in his letter of Decem- 

 ber 10, 1912, that Prunus salicina Lindley in Trans. Hort. Soc. VII. 239 

 (1830), of which he had recently seen the type specimen, is the same as 

 P. triflora, and the oldest name for this species, as Prunus trifiora Rox- 

 burgh, though pubUshed as a nomen nudum as early as 1814, was not 

 described until 1832. 

 Styrax Wilsonii (p. 293). PubUshed independently two months later under the 



same name by Rolfe in Bot. Mag. CXXXVIII. t. 8444 (July 1912). 

 Pterostyrax hispidus (p. 295). Citation for Halesia hispida Masters should read: 



Gard. Chron. ser. 2, XXII. 176, fig. 34 (1884). 

 Forsythia suspensa (p. 302). Wilson's specimens differ somewhat from typical F. 

 suspensa, var. Fortunei, and have been distinguished as: 

 Forsythia suspensa, var. Fortunei, f. atrocaulis Rehd'~'* in Mitt. Deutsch. 

 Dendr. Ges. XXI. 193 (1912). 

 Forsythia suspensa Rehder in Sargent, PI. Wilson, I. 302 (1912), quoad 

 specimina citata. 



Western Hupeh: (No. 637). 





