Cauoii A. M. Xonauii un lirilish Amp/iij/oJa. 



320 



l?r>*J4. raraiiipliithoc uioiiocuspis, j 1890. t:' Mam Urooki, sp. n. 



(i. O. ^ars. 1 1897. POrclieiuciR-llii iniiinta, 

 A plierusa bori'iilis, 6". O. Sars. Ktbijer. 



liaipinia crtiiulata, O. O. ty Anipilisca Escbriclilii, 



Sars. Krni/er. 



♦Metopa robusta, ^■. O. Surs. ? Stegocephaloides auratus, 



1896. Ampliilochoides luterme- 



diiis, 8p. n. 

 Gammarus Duebeni, Lillje- 



borg. 

 Cheirocratus interiuedius, 



G. O. sSars. 



G. b. Sars. 

 Monoculodcs tuberculatus, 

 G. O. Sam. 

 1898. Dulicliia inonacantha, G. O. 

 Sars. 



Fam. III. Pontoporeiidae. 

 [Genus 1. PoNTOPOREiA, Kioyer. 



[Pontoporeia femorata, Kroyer. 



1842. Vontoporeia femarafa, Kiover, \atuihist. Tidsbkr., 1 Haekkes, 



vol. iv. p. 153 ; Vovajre en Scaud. &c. pi. xxiii. fifr. 2. 

 1859. Pontoporeia furcif/era, Hruzoliiis, Scand. Amphip. nanim. p. 49. 

 1876. Pontoporeia femor at a awAfurcigera, Boeck, (138) pp. 197 & 201. 

 1891. Pontoporeia'femorata,G. O. Sars, (142) p. 123, pi. xli. fig. 1. 



Off Hare Island, Waigat Sound, Greenland, in 175 fathoms, 

 'Valorous,' 1875. 



Distrih. Klo.sterelv Fiord, East Finmark, 8-5 fathoms, 

 1890 (.1. ^f. A',) ; 'J'romso {Schneider) ; Spitsber<i;en (Loven) ; 

 GuU'of St. Lawrence [S. I. Smith)) : Mas. Nor. Through- 

 out the Arctic Ocean and southward as far as tiie Baltic. 

 Kiel (Blanc); West Sweden {Lilljeborg).'] 



Genus 2. Bathyporeia, Lindstiom. 



I cannot regard some of the following forms as entitled to 

 .*;)iecific — indeed, they seem hardly worthy of varietal — 



• Morav rirth (Ann. .'v: .^^a^^ Xat. Hist. .ser. 6, vul. xiii. p. 14H). 



+ Isle of Mnll. 



\ Tlio four followinnr ,«pecies are from the Clyde district. Uf tbe.se 

 Ampelisca E.f(hrichtii,Stiyoce)ihah>i(lvs a mat us, and Orchvmenella minuta, 

 Kro^er, bavo not been seen by Mr. Scott, bnt aiv jriveu bv liini from a 

 MS. cfltalofrnc of Cru.«tacea dred;,'ed by Sir J. Murray's steamer, the 

 'Mcdii.in.' In noticing OrchemeneUa uiintita in the paper }>receding' this 

 (p. liOt) I committed two i rrors, for the first of wbicii 1 cannot account; 

 tnt' date 1870 is .sub.'^titutcd for " H)-17 fatliom.s," and in stating " we do 

 not know the anthority who identified the specie.",'' I had overlooked a 

 note of Mr. Scott's at p. 109 (Fifteenth Ann. liep. Fishery Hoard of 

 Scotland), which Mates that the " Cru.stacea '' were identified bv K. 1. 

 Pocock. V.>i[. 1 have now dmstdted Mr. I'ocock, and he tells nie that 

 he wi^he,- that the nccnrrence of tin se sjiecies in l.,och Fyne should be 

 c.>ii.«id<red doubtful unless subsequently confirmed. 



