obtained chiejiy at .\funisu. 201 



47. Terias hapale, Mabille. 



I find that 1 was too liasty in quedtioiiing Prof. Auri- 

 villius's action with regard to tliis species ; the males are pale 

 lemon-yellow and without brand, the females white. Probably 

 T. niessalina is the nearest ally. 



48. Terias Marshalli, Butler. 



49. Terias Boisduvaliana, Mabillc. 



(J (J, Embi, 15th February, and Munisu. 



Both examples belong to the dry phase (T. lethiopica). I 

 am afraid that it will be dilfieult in future to decide as to 

 whether a female belongs to T. hapale or T. lioisJuvalianay 

 unless the two are taken together; I believe ours are now 

 all correctly sorted, but I do not feel absolutely sure. As a 

 rule, 1 think, the under surface of T. Boisduvaliana has more 

 sharply defined (less blurred) markings than in T. hapale. 



50. Teracolus Calais^ Cramer. 



51. Teracolus eris, Klug. 



52. Ttracolus incrttus^ Butler. 

 A pair of the dry phase from Munisu. 



53. Teracolus auxo^ Lucas. 



A pair of the dry phase from the Athi River in Central 

 East Africa. 



54. Teracolus xanthus^ var. metagone, Holi. 

 i $ , Athi River, Central East Africa. 

 This is a typical dry-season phase of the species. 



55. Teracolus pseudacaste, Butler. 



cJ c? ? ? , Athi River, Central East Africa. 

 All the examples are of the dry-season phase. 



56. Catopsilia Jlorella, Fabr. 



(J J $ ? , Munisu ; <S 6 , Embi, loth February, lUOU. 



57. IJefenois zvchalia, Boisd. 

 6 6, Embi, 15th February, IWU. 



