238 



NOTES 



troduction and the two previous Treati* 

 ses (II and III of the present Edition) 

 passim. 



P. 63. 1. 18 from top. 



nee u 11 a] Ed. Lugd. Batav. 1680 has 

 nulla. 



P. 63. 1. 13 from bottom. 



poffis] Ed. Lugd. Batav. 1680 has 

 poffit- 



P. 64. 1. 6 from top. 



Ex periment.l.] Ed. Lugd. Batav. 1662 

 has expiment. 2. — The experiment spo» 

 ken of in Ioannis Pecqveti . . . Experi= 

 menta Nova Anatomica . . . Parisiis 1651, 

 p. 50 is as follows: A collapsed, tied" 

 up bladder, being under great pressure, 

 will expand and swell, as soon as the 

 pressure is diminished. The experiment 

 is referred to here only as an example 

 of something surprising, something not 

 to be expected beforehand. 



P. 64. 1. 8 from top. 



Praeception.] Hippocrates, Prazcep* 

 tiones (napayyeXiai) 1 — 2. Ed. Littre. 

 vol. IX p. 252. 



P. 64. 1. 11-12 from top. 



Bilfii. . . experimento] See Steno's 

 Disputatio Anatomica De Glandulis Oris 

 . . . passim, especially thesis 42 (vol. I 

 p. 42 in the present Edition); further* 

 more, Ole Borch's Letter to Th. Bar= 

 tholin in Epist. Medicin. Cent. III. Haf* 

 niae 1667. Epist. LXXXV p. 364 and 

 Bils' Epistolica Dissertatio (see note to 

 vol. I p. 32. 1. 8 from top). 



P. 64. 1. 18 from top. 



obfervavi praefcriptam a Bilfio 

 methodumj See note to vol. I p. 32. 



1. 8 from top and p. 57. 1. 7—8 from 

 top. 



P. 65. 1. 9-10 from top. 



Barthol aggreffus eft?] See 



Ludovici De Bils . . . ad Th. Bartholin 

 num Regium Hafriiaz ProfeJJbrem Epi= 

 stola (dated Rotterdam April 10, 1661). 

 This pamphlet forms pp. 33—39 ot 

 Ludovici De Bils . . . Responsio Ad 

 Admonitiones D> Johannis ab Home . . . 

 Roterodami 1661. 



P. 67. 1. 1 from top. 



dicere] See life. Bartholini Spicilegi- 

 um Secundum Ex Vajis Lymphaticis . . . 

 Hafniae 1660, p. 40. 



P. 67. 1. 16 from top. 



occafionem Exfeqviarum Hepa= 

 tis] See note to vol. I p. 55. 1. 3 from 

 bottom. 



P. 68. 1. 3-4 from top. 



humorem pvaeparave] See Nicolai 

 Stenonis Disputatio Anatomica De Glan= 

 dulis Oris . . . Secunda. Lugd. Batav. 

 1661. thes. 22. (vol. I p. 31 in the pre* 

 sent Edition). 



P. 68. 1. 6 from bottom. 



Zaffii fenfum] Zassius, a physician 

 of Rotterdam, repeatedly came forward as 

 the defender of Bils; see, for instance, 

 Epistola Apologetica Ad Magnum Th. 

 Bartholinum . . . Roterodami 1661, in 

 which pp. 3—11 were written by Zassius 

 (see note to vol. I p. 32. 1. 8 from top). 



P. 69. 1. 5 from top. 



ita loqvitur] De Bils . . . Epistolica 

 Dissertatio ... p. 22. See note to vol. 

 I p. 32. 1. 8 from top. 



