" TE EVIDENCE IN BR-' 21 



bom. L it the dii fcy : 



ionary th • . • and h 



car. ies 1 lave - -. 



thr ugh com 



to st a hundred ml-. - - T as noth . 



compared with f 



ind 



i iy sue wii :.n 



t - 

 . have c lifi fcy i ring in Dig 



:v-.".u*.::n. J - ' 



. — y r A fcotle or S 

 5 — began ] 



just visihl in . I .' - - the i 



ere. This min tc organs n 



parts , n nor ideas. Yet in nine m ml 



o ■ ■ - ■■;._ i later il 



may write i B . and Juliet," or be i 



a new re o. Had lit 



aeoiiian evolution of ma:. 



■ Q€ v a witn — id the relatively aeons 



devel " But :f an. in a human germ, l 



_• t well the I itter impos=i:~T. But 



seen the neater m - " 



[esse -le. 



So mn ;hfoi the first 

 its t. : z . : .: : .~- evidence in favour :: hit theory is 

 important For it is . . . . 



:~. 7- : - - • 

 U slits for ..'.'. the worJ . that 



□ 



:: .. ..- .. '...,::'- ::.,:: : [her no 1 ring :. 



could - whether it is the man i an 



ape. To what but one mi 



