8 Canon A. M. Norman — Notes on the 



Genus Cyclops, 0. F. Miiller. 



Cyclops strenuus, Fischer. 



3851. Cyclops strenuus, Fischer, Bull, de la Soc. imp. Naturalistes d« 

 Moscou, t. xxiv. (2nd part) p. 419, pi. ix. figs. 12 21. 



This species was moderately common in the gathering 

 from Lake Kirkenes along with Diaptomus graciloides and 

 Heterocope appendicuJata. In these specimens the caudal 

 f'urca appears to be proportionally rather shorter than in those 

 from the Scottish lakes, but, as Dr. Schmeil has shown in 

 his splendid work on the freshwater Copepoda of Germany 

 (1802-96), this, which is a widely distributed species, 

 exhibits a tendency to variation even greater than is observed 

 in some of the other members of the genus. 



Cyclops Brucei, T. Scott. 



1899. Cycliyps Brucei, T. Scott, " The Crustacea of Franz-Josef Land," 

 Journ. Linn. Soc, Zool. vol. xxvii. p. 93, pi. vi. figs. 1-6. 



A number of specimens of Cyclops Brucei were collected 

 near Vadso ; these are identical with those from which the 

 species was described and which were obtained in a pond at 

 Klmwood, near Cape Flora, Franz-Josef Land *. Several of 

 the specimens from Vadso carried ovisacs. 



Fara. HarpacticidaB. 

 Genu's EcTiNOSOMA, Boeck. 



Ectinosoma Sarsi, Boeck. 



1864. Ectinosoma Sarsi, Boeck, Nye Slsegter og Arter af Saltsvands- 



Copepoder, p. 45. 

 1880. Ectinosoma spinipes, G. S. Brady, British Copepoda, vol. ii. p. 9, 



pi. xxxvi. figs. 1-10. 



A number of specimens of this Ectinosoma were collected 

 in Vadso Sound, but the species was not observed in the 

 other gatherings j it is one of the larger species of Ectinosoma. 



Ectinosoma propinquum, T. & A. Scott. 



1896. Ectinosoma propinquum, T. & A. Scott, Trans. Linn. Soc. 2nd ser. 

 Zool. vol. vi. p. 428, pi. xxxvi. figs. 19, 27, 46, et seq. 



This species was obtained very sparingly in gathering.? 

 from Lakse, Klosterelv, and Varanger Fiords. In general 



* In the original description of Cyclops Brucei it is stated inadvertently 

 that the third and fifth joint? of the female antennules are Ihe shortest 

 instead of the tiiird and sixth as shown by the drawing. 



