76 



PRINTED MATERIALS, MAPS, CHARTS 



32. McFarland, R. A., Knehr, C. A., & Berens, 



C. ^Metabolism and pulse rate as related to 

 reading under high and low levels of illumi- 

 nation. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 65-75. 



33. Paterson, D. G., & Tinker, M. A. Hoiv to 



make type readable. New York: Harper and 

 Bros., 1940. 



34. PiNSON, E. A. Maps, charts, and photographs, 



fluorescent and tonal keyed for red light. 

 USAF Air Materiel Command, Memoran- 

 dum Report No. EXP-M-49-695-120, Sept. 

 17, 1942. 



35. Preston, Katherine, Schwankl, H. P., & 



Tinker, M. A. The effect of variation in 

 color of print and background on legibility. 

 J. gen. Psychol., 1932, 6, 459-461. 



36. Raisz, E. General cartography. New York: 



McGraw-Hill, 1938. 



37. Rebert, G. N. a laboratory study of the 



reading of familiar numerals. /. educ. 

 Psychol., 1932,23,35-45. 



38. Roethlein, Barbara E. The relative legi- 



bility of different faces of printing types. 

 Amer. J. Psychol, 1912, 23, 1-36. 



39. Rose, Florence C., & Rostas, S. M. The 



effect of illumination on reading rate and 

 comprehension of college students. J. educ. 

 Psychol., 1946, 37, 279-292. 



40. Sanford, E. C. The relative legibility of the 



small letters. Amer. J. Psychol., 1887, 1, 

 402-435. 



41. Stanton, F. N., & Burtt, H. E. Influence of 



surface and tint of paper on speed of reading. 

 J. appl. Psychol, 1935, 19, 683-693. 



42. Sumner, F. C. Influence of color on legi- 



bility of copy. /. appl. Psychol, 1932, 16, 

 201-204. 



43. Taylor, Cornelia D. The relative legibility 



of black and white print. /. educ. Psychol, 

 1934, 25, 561-578. 



44. Tinker, M. A. The relative legibility of the 



letters, the digits, and of certain mathe- 

 matical signs. J. gen. Psychol, 1928, 1, 

 472-495. 



45. Tinker, M. A. Reading reactions for mathe- 



matical formulae. J. exp. Psychol, 1926, 

 9, 444-467. 



46. Tinker, M. A. How formulae are read. 



Amer. J. Psychol, 1928, 40, 476-483. 



47. Tinker, M. A. A photographic study of 



eye-movements in reading formulae. Genet. 

 Psychol. Monogr., 1928, 3, No. 2, 65-182. 



48. Tinker, M. A. The relative legibility of 



modern and old stjde numerals. /. exp. 

 Psychol, 1930, 13, 453-461. 



49. Tinker, M. A. The influence of form of type 



on the perception of words. /. appl. 

 Psychol, 1932,16, 167-174. 



50. Tinker, M. A. Effect of illumination in- 



tensities upon speed of perception and upon 

 fatigue in reading. /. educ. Psychol, 1939, 

 30, 561-571. 



51. Tinker, M. A. Illumination intensities for 



reading newspaper type. J. educ. Psychol., 

 1943,34,247-250. 



52. Tinker, M. A. Reliability of blinking fre- 



quency employed as a measure of read- 

 ability. /. exp. Psychol, 1945, 35, 418-424. 



53. Tinker, M. A. Validity of frequency of 



blinking as a criterion of readability. J. 

 exp. Psychol, 1946, 36, 453-460. 



54. Tinker, M. A. Illumination standards for 



effective and easy seeing. Psychol. Bull, 

 1947, 44, 435-450. 



55. Washburne, J. N. An experimental study of 



various graphic, tabular, and textual 

 methods of presenting quantitative ma- 

 terial. J. educ. Psychol, 1927, 18, 361-376, 

 465-476. 



56. Webster, Helen A., & Tinker, M. A. The 



influence of paper surface on the percepti- 

 bility of print. J. appl Psychol, 1935, 

 19, 145-147. 



57. Webster, Helen A., & Tinker, M. A. The 



influence of type face on the legibility of 

 print. /. appl. Psychol, 1935, 19, 43-52. 



58. Weiss, A. P. The focal variator. /. exp. 



Psychol, 1917, 2, 106-113. 



59. Young, Katherine D. Legibility of printed 



materials. USAF Air Materiel Command, 

 Memorandum Report No. TSEAA-8-694-1A, 

 June 10, 1946. 



60. Standard symbols adopted by The Board of 



Surveys and Maps, United States of America. 

 Washington. D. C. : U. S. Geological Survey. 



