98 



DESIGN AND USE OF INSTRUMENTS 



45. Knauft, E. B. The design, attachment and 



precision of an auxiliary range dial for the 

 Mark 4 Radar. US NDRC, Applied Psy- 

 chology Panel, OSRD Report No. 3906, 

 July 17, 1944, pp. 8, Restricted. 



46. Laxjer, a. R. Factors which influence visibil- 



ity in daylight and under artificial illumina- 

 tion. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 1933, 40, 185. 



47. Lawrence, M., & MacMillan, J. W. Anno- 



tated bibliography on human factors in engi- 

 neering design. USN, BuMed., Aviat. Br. 

 Res. Div., NavMed 1079, Project X-651(AV- 

 340-a), February 1946, pp. ix-209. (RE- 

 STRICTED) 



48. Lawrence, M., & Peckham, R. H. Evalua- 



tion of directional gyro control unit GE Model 

 SKC SAC. Letter to Cmdr. 0. W. Che- 

 nault (MC) USN, BUMED-X-RCO la, 

 July 19, 1946. 



49. Lee, R. H., & Finch, E. M. Instrument light- 



ing and low level illumination in submarine 

 conning towers. USN, NMRI, Research 

 Project X-380, Report No. 1, January 17, 

 1945, pp. 16. (RESTRICTED) 



50. LoucKS, R. B. Legibility of aircraft instru- 



ment dials: The relative legibility of tachom- 

 eter dials. US AAF, School of Aviation 

 Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas, Project 

 No. 265, Report No. 1, May 30, 1944, pp. 8, 

 pi. 3. 



51. LoucKS, R. B. Legibility of aircraft instru- 



ment dials: A further investigation of the 

 relative legibility of tachometer dials. US 

 AAF, School of Aviation Medicine, Ran- 

 dolph Field, Texas, Project No. 265, Report 

 No. 2, October 27, 1944, pp. 4, pi. 2. 



52. LoucKS, R. B. Legibility of aircraft instru- 



ment dials: The relative legibility of various 

 climb indicator dials and pointers. US AAF, 

 School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph 

 Field, Texas, Project No. 286, Report No. 

 1, November 25, 1944, pp. 5, pi. 5. 



53. LoucKS, R. B. Legibility of aircraft instru- 



ment dials: The relative legibility of manifold 

 pressure indicator dials. US AAF, School 

 of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, 

 Texas, Project No. 325, Report No. 1, De- 

 cember 7, 1944, pp. 4, pi. 4. 



54. LoucKS, R. B. Evaluation of aircraft attitude 



indicators on the basis of Link Instrument 

 Ground Trainer performance. US AAF, 

 School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph 

 Field, Texas, Project No. 341, Report No. 

 1, June 22, 1945, pp. 15, pi. 2. 



55. LucKiESH, M.,& Taylor, A. H. Visual acuity 



at low brightness levels. Amer. J. Ophthal., 

 1944, 27, 53-57. 



56. McFarland, R. A. Human factors in air 



transport design. New York: McGraw Hill, 

 1946. Pp. xix-670. 



57. McGehee, W. Comparative study of pilot 



fatigue resulting from extended instrument 

 flight using the standard AAF and British 

 instrument panels. USN, Bu-Med., Final 

 report. Project TED No. ATL-R-601, not 

 dated, pp. 48. 



58. Maier, E. Zur Bestgestalttung der ziffer- 



blatter von stopphuhren. Industr. Psycho- 

 tech., 1931, 8, 97-113. 



59. Moore, R. C, & Tate, G. F. Engine instru- 



ment simplification program: "Single" vs. 

 "dual" instrtiments. US AAF AMC, Engng. 

 Div., TSEPE-655-1478, November 29, 1946, 

 pp. 47. 



60. Paterson, C. C, Walsh, J. W. T., &Higgins, 



W. F. An investigation of radium luminous 

 compound. Proc. phys. Soc, London, 1917, 

 29, 215-249. 



61. Paterson, D. G., & Tinker, M. A. How to 



make type readable. New York: Harper 

 and Bros., 1940. Pp. xix-209. 



62. Peterson, O. Uber die Sinnfalligkeit von 



Blindfliigesgeraten. Industr. Psychotech., 

 1939, 16, 225-239. 



63. Reed, J. D. , & Bartlett, N. R. The accuracy 



of range estimation on a PPI with respect to 

 the distance of the target from the range rings. 

 Systems Research, Johns Hopkins Univ., 

 November 1, 1947, pp. 9. (RESTRICTED) 



64. Reese, T. W., Volkmann, J., Rogers, S., & 



Kaufman, E. L. Special problems in the 

 estimation of bearing. Systems Research, 

 Johns Hopkins Univ., January 15, 1948, 

 pp. 46. 



65. RicHTMYER,F. K.,«&; Howes, F. L. A method 



of studying the behavior of the eye under 

 different conditions of illumination. Trans. 

 Ilium. Engng. Soc, 1916, 11, 100-113. 



66. RiGGS, L. A. The development of a counter or 



odometer-type scale to replace the micrometer 

 scale of the panoramic telescope M-12. US 

 NDRC, Applied Psychology Panel, OSRD 

 Report No. 4390, November 28, 1944, pp. 

 10. (RESTRICTED) 



67. Rogers, S., Volkmann, J., Reese, T. W., & 



Kaufman, E. L. Accuracy and variability 

 of direct estimates of bearing from large dis- 

 play screens. Systems Research, Johns 

 Hopkins Univ., May 15, 1947, pp. 41. 



68. RuFFELL Smith, H. P. The design and dis- 



play of pilots' instruments. GB Air Min- 

 istry, Flying Personnel Research Commit- 

 tee, FPRC 692, March 1948, pp. 19. (RE- 

 STRICTED) 



