REFERENCES 



217 



cation Board, U. S. Department of Com- 

 merce, Washington, D. C.) 



23. Miller, G. A. Sensitivity to changes in the 



intensity of white noise and its relation to 

 masking and loudness. J. acoust. Soc. 

 Amer., 1947, 19, 609-619. 



24. Montgomery, H. C. Influence of experi- 



mental technique on the measurement of 

 differential intensity sensitivity of the ear. 

 /. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1935, 7, 39-43. 



25. MuNSON, W. A. The growth of auditory 



sensation. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1947, 19, 

 584-591. 



26. Pepinsky, a. Pitch as a function of the dura- 



tion and extent of frequency modulation. 

 Ph.D. Thesis, State Univ. of Iowa, 1939. 



27. RiESZ, R. R. Differential intensity sensi- 



tivity of the ear for pure tones. Phys. 

 Rev., 2nd Series, 1928, 31, 867-875. 



28. Shower, E. G. & Biddulph, R. Differential 



pitch sensitivity of the ear. J. acoust. 

 Soc. Amer., 1931, 3, 275-287. 



29. Stevens, S. S. The relation of pitch to in- 



tensity. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1935, 6, 

 150-154. 



30. Stevens, S. S. A scale for the measurement 



of a psychological magnitude: loudness. 

 Psychol. Rev., 1936, 43, 405-416. 



31. Stevens, S. S. & Davis, H. Hearing. New 



York: John Wiley, 1938. 



32. Stevens, S. S. & Newman, E. B. The local- 



ization of actual sources of sound. Amer. 

 J. Psychol., 1936, 48, 297-306. 



33. Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, 



E. B. a scale for the measurement of the 

 psychological magnitude pitch. J. acoust. 

 Soc. Amer., 1937, 8, 185-190. 



34. Taylor, D. W. Learning telegraphic code. 



Psychol. Bull., 1943, 40, 461-487. 



35. TuRNBULL, W. W. Pitch discrimination as a 

 function of tonal duration. /. exp. Psychol., 



1944, 34, 302-316. 



36. Wallach, H. On sound localization. /. 



aco^ist. Soc. Amer., 1938, 10, 270-274. 



