228 



AUDITION IN SONAR OPERATION 



2. Bekest, G. V. Zur Theorie des Horens. 



Uber die Bestimmung des einem reinen 

 Tonempfinden entsprechenden Erregungs- 

 gebietes der Basilarmembran vermittels 

 Ermiidungserscheinungen. Physik. Z., 1929, 

 30, 115-125. 



3. B:ekest, G. v. Zur Theorie des Horens. 



Uber die eben merkbare Amplituden- und 

 Frequenzanderungeines Tones. Die Theorie 

 der Schwebungen. Physik. Z., 1929, 30, 

 721-745. 



4. Bekest, G. v. On the elasticity of the 



cochlear partition. /. acoust. Soc. Amer., 

 1948, 20, 227-240. 



5. Bremer, F. & Dow, R. S. The cerebral 



acoustic area of the cat. A combined 

 oscillographic and cytoarchitectonic study. 

 /. Neurophysiol., 1939, 2, 308-318. 



6. Brogden, W. J. & Culler, E. A. Device for 



the motor conditioning of small animals. 

 Science, 1936, 83, 269-270. 



7. Brogden, W. J., Girden, E., Mettler, F. 



A., & Culler, E. Acoustic value of the 

 several components of the auditory system 

 in cats. Amer. J. Physiol., 1936, 116, 

 252-261. 



8. BtJRCK, W., KoTOWSKi, P., & Lights, H. Der 



Aufbau des Tonhohenbewusstseins. Elek. 

 Nachr.-Techn., 1935, 12, 326-333. 



9. BtJRCK, W., KOTOWSKI, p., & LiCHTE, H. 



Die Horbarkeit von Laufzeitdifferenzen. 

 Elek. Nachr.-Techn., 1935, 12, 355-367. 



10. BtJRCK, W., KoTOWSKi, p. & LicHTE, H. Die 



Lautstarke von Knacken, Gerauschen und 

 Tonen. Elek. Nachr.-Techn., 1935, 12, 278- 

 288. 



11. Child, I. L., & Wendt, G. R. The temporal 



course of the influence of visual stimulation 

 upon the auditory threshold. J. exp. 

 Psychol, 1938, 23, 108-127. 



12. Crowe, S. J., Guild, S. R., & Polvogt, 



L. M. Observations on the pathology of 

 high-tone deafness. Bull. Johns Hopkins 

 Hosp., 1934, 54, 315-379. 



13. Culler, E., Finch, G., Girden, E. & 



Brogden, W. Measurement of acuity by 

 the conditioned response technique. J . gen. 

 Psychol., 1935, 12, 223-227. 



14. Flynn, J. P., Truscott, I. P. & Newman, 



E. B. Intensity discrimination as a function 

 of signal-to-noise ratio and intensity level. 

 Amer. Psychologist., 1946, 1, 277. (Abstract) 



15. Freund, L., & HoFMANN, L. Licht und 



Horen. Med. Klinik, 1929, 25, 226-228. 



16. Galambos, R. & Davis, H. The response of 



single auditory-nerve fibers to acoustic 

 stimulation. J. Neurophysiol., 1943, 6, 

 39-57. 



17. Galambos, R., & Davis, H. Inhibition of 



activity in single nerve fibers by acoustic 

 stimulation. J. Neurophysiol., 1944, 7, 

 287-303. 



18. Galambos, R., & Davis, H. Action poten- 



tials from single auditory-nerve fibers? 

 Science, 1948, 108, 513. 



19. Garner, W. R., & Miller, G. A. Differ- 



ential sensitivity to intensity as a function 

 of the duration of the comparison tone. 

 /. exp. Psychol., 1944, 34, 450-463. 



20. Guild, S. R. Tone localization in the cochlea 



II. Discussion from the point of view of 

 studies on human temporal bones. Ann. 

 Otol., Rhinol., Laryngol., 1935, 44, 738-753. 



21. Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods. New 



York: McGraw-Hill, 1936. 



22. Harris, J. D. Preliminary report on propeller 



noise discrimination. Report of the Medical 

 Research Department, U. S. Submarine 

 Base, New London, Conn., December 26, 

 1944. 



23. Harris, J. D. Functions of loudness dis- 



crimination in submarine sonar operation. 

 Interval report. Bureau of Medicine and 

 Surgery, Research Division, Project X-53. 

 Issued by Medical Research Department, 

 U. S. Submarine Base, New London, Conn. 

 April 5, 1945. 



24. Harris, J. D. Pitch discrimination in noise. 



Amer. Psychologist, 1946, 1, 276-277 (Ab- 

 stract). 



25. Hartmann, G. W. The facilitating effect of 



strong general illumination upon the dis- 

 crimination of pitch and intensity differ- 

 ences. /. exp. Psychol., 1934, 17, 813-822. 



26. Hawkins, J. E. The masking of pure tones 



and speech by white noise. Part I, OSRD 

 Report No. 5387. (Psycho-Acoustic Labo- 

 ratory, Harvard University, October 1, 1945.) 



27. HiRSH, I. J. Binaural summation and in- 



teraural inhibition as a function of the level 

 of masking noise. Ainer. J. Psychol., 

 1948, 61, 205-213. 



28. Hirsh, I. J. The influence of interaural 



phase on interaural summation and in- 

 hibition. /. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1948, 

 20, 536-544. 



29. Kappauf, W. E. The application of con- 



ditioning methods to the study of discrimi- 

 nation and the measurement of differential 

 thresholds in animals. /. Psychol., 1943, 

 15, 129-135. 



30. Karlin, J. E. Auditory tests for the ability 



to discriminate the pitch and loudness of 

 noises. OSRD Report No. 5294 (Psycho- 

 Acoustic Laboratory, Harvard University, 

 August 1, 1945.) 



