Fossil Corah. 



211 



Oi-tmann^ appears, therefore, to be perfectly justified in con- 

 cluding that Edwards & Haimc reversed the names of these two 

 species. 



The Christmas Island collection includes three specimens of this 

 species, which have the following dimensions : — 



No. 53. Xo. 306. 



"Width of calicinal series 3 mm. ... 3-4 mm. 



Jfumber of primary septa per cm. 9 ... 7 



No. 100. 



3-4 mm. 



7-9 



They arc therefore referable to the Z. tenuis of Edwards & Haime 

 {non Dana) and the Z. phrygia of Ellis & Solander, with whose 

 figure they agree. 



A slide 'cut from specimen No. 306 affects the generic diagnosis 

 of Leptoria. As generally defined, the walls of adjacent corallites 

 are said to unite directly; but, as shown on Fig. 1, the adjacent 



Fig. 1. 



series are, in places, united by costae and exotheca, and not by 

 the walls. This fact led me,' on first examination of the slide, 

 to feel some doubt whether the coral were a Leptoria. But it 

 appears only necessary to modify the generic diagnosis to this slight 

 extent; for the same mode of union of the series of corallites 

 occurs in L. tenuis (Dana). Thus Dana's description of that 

 species refers to the corallum as very cellular ; and his figure of 

 a transverse section (Dana, op. cit., pi. xii, fig. 7(?) shows the 

 compound nature of the walls. 



Mr, Bernard's manuscript list of the recent corals collected by 

 Mr. Andi-ews at Christmas Island shows that Z. phrygia still 

 lives on the neighbouring reefs. 



^ Ortmanu : op. cit., p. 172. 



