Analysis of Heterogeneity in the Population 



331 



1 2 



5- 

 31- 

 4&' 

 40- 

 61. 



26- 



1- 



7 



31 



-m^ 



^ s 



14 



8 — 

 6 — 



29 — 



--m 



20 



• — 35 

 41 



•44 

 71 





I \ \ \ ^- 



-1* 

 % 



101 



83 



44 



26 



5 



92 



38 



141 



77 



6 



9 



\^ (^ 2 



Popnlation 607, First Generation. Population 719, Second Generation. 



Fig. 151. — Census showing conditions In first and second generations In 1908 

 at Chapultepec test colony. 



THE CHALCiCOMULA COLONY TEST. 



About the middle of June of 1905 a representative culture from this location 

 was introduced into a test location about a mile from the Chapultepec test, and 

 there thrived well and gave in the following generations a well-defined group, 

 that was constant in appearance. In figures 152 to 156 are shown the results 



51 



22 



11 



9 — 



/ 



13 



W> ^ 22 



61 



45 



(^) 42 



\ ^---11 

 \ ^— 4 



44 



31 



— -11 



-40 



77 



-89 



/ / 



11 21 



<» m — 46 

 i^ \ m — 9 



Population 305, First Generation. Population 399, Second Generation. 



Fig 152. — Census showing conditions In first and second generations in Chal- 

 cicomula test colony in 1905. In the first generation the introduced generation are 

 indicated along side of their progeny. 



of the tests in these locations, with the summated generations in the original 

 colony for the corresponding generation and time, with the result that in the new 

 location the test colony remained well within the range of the population in the 

 parent location during the same period. In the original location the population 



