96 
p. 432. H. dorsalis Fabr. — lege Mant. I. p. 192. 
» „HI. 12pustulatus Fabr. —- lege Oliv. Ent. III. 40. p. 31. 
This livraison was at least contemporaneous with Fabricius, 
the dates of the volumes of Olivier are quite misleading, 
much of Vol. IV. was published in 1799 only. 
„433. ZH. pusillu Fabr. — lege Spec. Ins. p. 297. 
» HI. gabriusculus — lege glabriuseulus. 
„434. H. halensis Fabr. — lege Mant. I. p. 192. 
» „HH. hyperboreus Gyll. — var. assimilis Payk. sec. 'Thoms. 
Skand. Col. IX. a 
» » ZH. inaequalis Fabr. — lege Gen. Ins. p. 239. 
„435. 4. Dbineatus DeGeer. — lege Fabr. Syst. Ent. p. 234; 
tliere is no such name in DeGeer, the reference is to D. grr- 
seostrtatus. 
»„ „»  H. hituratus Fabr. — lege Spec. Ins. p. 296. 
„ 436. H. piceus Sturm: —— var. juscipennis, where it stands cor- 
rectly. 
„437. H. trifaseiatus Wollast. Was described fron Ireland only 
and is not really found there. 
»»  H. morio Dej. Im using this name, morio Heer — mivalıs 
has been forgotten, I should propose atriceps thor this 
species. 
‚438. H. Gpustulatus Fabr. — lege Gen. Ins. p. 239. 
„439. H. pieipes Fabr — lege Mant. I. p. 192 (1787), but use 
impressopunetatus Schaller. 1783. 
» ». 2. pietus Fabr. — lege Mant. I. p. 192. 
»». H. planus Fabr. — lege Spec. Ins. App. p. 501; use the 
older name ater Forst. 1771. 
» » 4. fuseulus Ill. — lege Schrank. Enum. p. 203; use the 
older name ater Forst. 1771. 
„441. H. tinetus Clark — palustris var., sec. exempl. typicum. 
„ 448. Rhantus bistriatus Bergstr. — See p. 466 under Hydatieus 
seminiger De&eer; his right place is as Zhantus. 
„449. Rh. notatus Fabr. 1792. — lege Bergstr. Num. V. 
p- 10. 
» » Rh. signatus Fabr. — lege Syst. Ent. p. 234. (1775). 
» 9» Rh. varius Fabr. — lege Syst. Ent. p. 233. 
„„ 450. Colymbetes eicur Fabr. — lege Mant. I. p. 190. 
