36 Canon A. M. Norman on British Amphipoda. 



88. Amphilochoides intermedius, T. Scott. 



1896. Amphilochoides intermedins, T. Scott, Fourteenth Annual Report 

 Scotcli Fish. Board, p. 159, pi. iv. figs. 1-3. 



Hah. Various parts of the Firth of Forth {T. S.). 



Genus 3. GiTANOPSiS, G. O. Sars. 



89. Gitanopsis hispinosa (Boeck). 



1870. Amphilochus hispinosus, Boeck, (137) p. 51. 



1876. Amphilochus bispi^iosus, Boeck, (138) p. 435, pi. x. fig. 1. 



1892. Gitanopsis bispinosa, G. 0. Sars, (142) p. 224, pi. Ixxvi. fig. 2. 



Bah. " Dredged off Blackwater-fbot, Arran, N.B., in 

 20 fathoms, bottom sand and mud " {D. R.). 



Distrib. Lofoten Islands, Norway [G. 0. Sars) : Mus. 

 JSor. South and West Norway as far north as Lofoten 

 Islands, but nowhere in abundance, generally in 50-100 

 fathoms {G. 0. bars)', Greenland [Hansen); west coast of 

 France {Ckevreux). 



90. Gitanopsis inermis, G. O. Sars. 



1882. Gitanopsis inermis, G. O. Sars, (102) p. 51. 



1892. Gitanopsis inermis, G. O. Sars, (142) p. 224, pi. Ixxvi. fig. 2. 



Bah. Specimens taken by Professor G. S. Brady * off 

 Cullercoats, Northumberland, were identified by Mr. Stebbing 

 as this species (Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumb., Durham, and 

 Newcastle-upon-Tyne, vol. xiii. pt. 3, 1900, p. 442). 



Distrih. Professor Sars has met with this species only in a 

 single locality, and that a very northern one — Vadso — where 

 it was found rather sparingly in 20-50 fathoms. 



Genus 4. Gitana, Boeck. 



91. Gitana Sars'd, Boeck. 



1870. Gitana Sarsi, Boeck, (137) p. 52. 



1876. Gitana Sarsi, lioeck, (138) p. 4.39, pi. xi. fig. 2. 



1878. Ai)i2)hiIochus >Sabi-i7icB, St&hmiig, "Two new Species of Amphi- 



podous Crustacea," Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5, vol. ii. p. 365, 



pi. XV. tigs. 1 a-ff. 

 18y2. Gitana Sarsii, G. O. Sars, (142) p. 228, pi. Ixxviii. fig. 1. 

 1893. Gitana Sarsii, Bella Valle, (139) p. 590, pi. xxix. figs. 18-32. 



* It may be desirable to mention that Professor Brady, who has done 

 so much good work among the Entomostraca, does not study the Amphi- 

 poda, and that when his name is added to a locality, if it be this present 

 locality the specimens have been determined by Mr. Stebbing, and from 

 all other localities they have been identified by myself. 



