Canon A. M. Norman on British Amphipoda. 329 



1894. Paratnphithoe monocuspis, 

 G. O. Sars. 

 Apherusa borealis, G. O. Sars. 

 Hai'pinia creiiulata, G. O. 

 Sars. 

 *Metopa robusta, G. O. Sars. 

 1896. Amphilochoides iuterme- 

 dius, sp. n. 

 Gammarus Duebeni, Lillje- 



horg. 

 Cheirocratus intermedius, 

 G. O. Sars. 



1890. t.^ Moera Brnoki, sp. n. 



1897. POrcliemenella miuuta, 



Kroi/er. 

 |?Ainpelisca Eschrichtii, 



Ki'oyer. 

 ? Stegocephaloides auratus, 



G. O. Sars. 

 Monoculodes tuberculatua, 



G. O. Sars. 



1898. Diilicliia nionacantha, G. O. 



Sars. 



Fani. III. PontoporeiidsB. 

 [Genus 1. PoNTOPOREiA, Kioyer. 



\Pontoporeia femornta, Kvoyer. 



1842. Pontoporeia femorata, Kroyer, Naturhist. Tidsskr., 1 Raekkes, 



vol. iv. p. 153 ; Voyag-e en Scand. &c. pi. xxiii. fig. 2. 

 1859. Pontoporeia fur cigera, Bruzelius, Scand. Amphip. Gamm. p. 49. 

 1876. Pontoporeia femorata andifurcigera, Boeck, (]38) pp. 197 & 201. 

 1891, Pontoporeia femorata, G. O. Sars, (142) p. 123, pi. xli. fig. 1. 



Off Hare Island, Waigat Sound, Greenland, in 175 fathoms, 

 ' Valorous/ 1 875. 



Distrib. Klosterelv Fiord, East Finmark, 3-5 fathoms, 

 1890 (A. M. N.) ; Tromso {Schneider) ; Spitsbergen {Loven) ; 

 Gulf of St. Lawrence {S. L Smith)) : Mus. Nor. Through- 

 out the Arctic Ocean and southward as far as the Baltic. 

 Kiel [Blavc); West Sweden [LiJIjeborg).'] 



Genus 2. Bathyporeia, Lindstrom. 



1 cannot regard some of the following forms as entitled to 

 specific — indeed, thej seem hardly worthy of varietal — 



• Moray Firth (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. xiii. p. 148). 



t Isle of Mull. 



t The four following species are from the Clyde district. Of these 

 Atupelisca Eschrichtii, Stegocephaloides auratus, and Orchemenella tnimda, 

 Kroyer, have not been seen by Mr. Scott, but are given by him from a 

 MS. catalogue of Crustacea dredged by Sir J. Murray's steamer, the 

 * Medusa.' In noticing Orchemenella minuta in the paper preceding this 

 (p. 204) I committed two errors, for the first of which I cannot account ; 

 the date 1870 is substituted for " 16-17 fathoms," and in stating " we do 

 not know the authority who identified the species," I had overlooked a 

 note of Mr. Scott's at p. 109 (Fifteenth Ann. Rep. Fishery Board of 

 Scotland), which states that the "Crustacea" were identified by R. I. 

 Pocock, Esq. I have now consulted Mr. Pocock, and he tells me that 

 he wishes that the occurrence of these species in Loch Fyne should be 

 considered doubtful unless subsequently confirmed. 



