Crustacea descrihed hij Bate and West wood . 83 



100. Gammarus locusta (Linne), p. 378. 



101. tenuimanus, Bate, p. 384, = ? Mcera Batei, Norman (see 



Walker, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. xv. 1895, p. 471)^ 



102. Ediuardsii, Bate, p. 386 (not as yet recognized by any 



other author). 



103. puUx (De Geer), p. 388. 



104. dubius, Johnston, p. 397, = ? 



105. macidatus, Johnston, p. 399, = (ra?»»?aro^s/s maculatus 



(Johnston). 



106. Megatncera semiserrata. Bate, p. 401,'= Ceradocus semiserratus 



(Bate). 



107. longimanuH (Leach, MS.), p. 403, = 3ioBra otJionis (H. 



Milne- Edwards), r? • 



108. othonis (H. Milne-Edwards), p. 405, = Mcera othonis (H. 



Milne-Edwards), $ . 



109. Alderi, Bate, p. 407, = Melita ohtusata (Montagu), $ . 



110. brevicaudata, Bate, p. 409, = Elasmopus rapax, Costa. 



111. Eisdadus longicaudatus. Bate and Westwood, p. 412, = Photis 



longicaudata (Bate and Westwood). 



112. AmpJiithoe riibricata (Montagu), p. 418. 



113. liftorina. Bate, p. 422,^ Amphithoe rubi'icata (Mon- 

 tagu), $. 



114. alhomacidata , Bate and Westwood (nee Kroyer), p. 426. 



The specimen figured is in my collection. It is Podoceropisis 

 exeavata. Bate, $ . The long setae of the antennae and the 

 first gnathopods as drawn agree with Podoceropsis, but the 

 specimen shows nothing of the strong upturned third segment 

 of metasome or the Ampliithoe-Y]ke last uropod of Bate and 

 Westwood's figure. 



115. gammaroides. Bate, p. 427 , = Pleonexes gammaroides. 



Bate, S ■ 



116. Sunamphithoe hamulus, Bate, p. 430,=: Pleonexes gammaroides, 



Bate, $. 

 117. conformata, Bate, p. 432,=. Sunamphithoe pelagica (H. 



Milne-Edwards). 

 118. Podocerus pidchellus (Leach), p. 43'o,=-BruzeUella* falcata 



(Montagu), S . 



* I have exaruined the types of the geuera Podocerus and Jassa in the 

 British Museum, and fully confirm what Messrs. Stebbing and Walker 

 have written upon them, that Podocerus variegatus, Leach (as interpreted 

 by Milne-Edwards's figure in ' Regne Animal de Cuvier," but not 

 P. variegatus, B. & W.), is Platophmm Dancinii, and that Jassa pelagica. 

 Leach (but not of B. & W.), is the same as Podocerus capillatus, B. & W. 

 Bruzelius long ago restricted the use of Jas»a to the species last men- 

 tioned, which has only a rudimentary appendage (scarcely visible with a 

 high power) to the antennules. This use must be maintained, and not 

 Parajassu as suggested by Stebbing. I have therefore found it necessary 

 to institute a genus BrTizeliella. with B. falcata, Montagu, as its tvpe. 



6* 



