32 
WB. Sie Ney 
so far computed seem to be in favor of continuous trends, or at least 
do not disprove the trends based on regional magnetic or geologic evi- 
dence. 
00 ON ANFSWHNH 
LIST OF REGIONAL ANOMALIES (FIG. 10) 
. High trend beginning between Stevenson and Ft. Payne and extending to Hamilton 
. High trend Guntersville-Greensboro 
. Low trend Center-Wetumpka 
. High trend Ashland to a location between Tuskegee and Wetumpka 
. Low trend Tuskegee-Troy 
. Low trend Camden-Elba 
. High trend Butler to a location between Grove Hill and Pine Hill 
. Hatchetigbee anticline 
. High trend north of Mobile 
. Trend of “highs” from Ellisville to Fayette 
Possible high trend Butler-Philadelphia-Greenwood-north of Rosedale-between 
De Witt and Varner 
. High area near Iuka 
. Possible high trend Oxford, Water Valley to a location between Helena and Tunica 
. High trend Marianna-Brinkley 
. High trend of Arkansas Valley 
. Low trend Marshall-Fayetteville-Tahlequah 
. “High” at Miami and Ozark region 
. Neutral trend parallel with axis of Ouachita Mountains from area between Hugo 
and Antlers toward area south of Mena and Mount Ida to Sheridan 
. High trend Hamburg-Star City 
. High trend Winnsboro-Bastrop 
. Possible high trend Farmerville-Harrisonburg 
. Low trend Ruston-Winfield 
. “Highs’”’ south of Shreveport and Many, with connecting trends parallel with axis 
of Sabine uplift 
. Possible “‘high” northeast of Marksville 
. High trend between Ville Platte and Opelousas 
. High trend between Morgan City and Napoleonville 
. High trend Lafayette-Lake Charles 
. “High” south of Liberty, regional trend 
. “High” south of Houston, regional trend 
. “High” at Refugio, regional trend 
. Possible high trend Point Isabel-Corpus Christi 
. Possible high trend east of Edinburgh-Falfurias-San Diego 
. Possible high trend south of Newton-Conroe-Columbus 
. “High” at Lampasas, Llano, Burnet, corresponding with the Llano-Burnet uplift 
. “High” at Sonora, Ozona, Eldorado 
. “High” from Brady to Jacksboro, corresponding with the Bend arch 
. Possible high trend north of San Angelo 
. “High” indicated by the vectors at Rankin and Stiles, probably corresponding with 
the Big Lake anticline 
. “High” south of Monahans, with trend corresponding with Central Basin plat- 
form 
. “Low” near Pecos, corresponding with Delaware basin 
. Low trend, corresponding with the axis of main Permian basin 
. “Low” between Bovina, Tulia, Canyon, interpreted as basin 
. High trend Marietta~-Lawton-Hobart-Sayre, corresponding with Wichita Moun- 
tains 
. High trend Tishomingo-Durant, corresponding with Arbuckle Mountains 
. High trend Sulphur-Oklahoma City 
. High trend Rush Springs-Minco 
. Possible high trend Fort Smith-Muskogee-Watonga 
