14 Mr. Stivt('h'.s Hiui>iii-kx on flut xi/noin/iiu/ of the 



Fi^. 18. Zi/i/(i'ii'i xi(h(lli(i)hfiii((, Felder, is wA unlikely to prove 

 identical with Z. contraria, Walker, which has the 

 secondaries very pale reddi.sh. At best it can only take 

 rank as a variety of that species. 



Fig. 19. ZvG.i-iN A OCELLARIS, Felder. The specimen in the Brit- 

 ish Museum has the j^round color of the ocelli white. 



Fi,g-. 21. EucTENiA zyg^:nyides, Felder, is very near to, if not 

 identical with Procris contraria, Walker, which differs 

 in having the abdomen luteous. 



PLATE 83. 



Fig. 7. Heteriisia riiicrocepliala, Felder, = Eterusia dirupta. 

 Cat. Lep. Het. B. Mus., supp., 199, (1864). 



Fig. 8. HeterKxia a'cadn, Felder, = Eterusia PUiiCHELLA, var. ? 

 Cat. Lep. Het. B. Mus., 430, (1854). Walker supposed 

 his insect to be a variety of the Chalcosia pulchella, 

 of KoUar, but as this latter insect proves to be Chalcosia 

 PHALJiNARiA, Kollar's name must sink, and Walker's 

 l)e retained for this insect. 



Fig. 18,19. Isochroiita f'i//ax, Felder, = Sciathos punotigera, 

 Cat. Lep. Het. B." Mu.s., 752, (1855). • 



PLATE S4. 



Fig. 2. (ioNOMETA POSTiCA ^ , Felder, ^ Pachypasa e.ffasa, 

 Walker, Cat. Lep. Het. B. Mus. Walker described the 

 ^ under the name ado}ited by Feldei'. 



Fig. 5. OpsiRHiNA FLEXicosTA $ , Felder, ^ 0. decorata, \ 

 Walker. There is but little [if any difference between 

 these species except that the color of the latter is reddish 

 instead of yellowish. 



Fig. 9. Rldnormne calliqnma ^ , Felder, = Entomcfd o/iJi(/uii, 

 Cat. Lep.' Het. B.'Mus., 973, (1855). 



Fig. 10. liJiuux/i/ne calligama ^ , Felder, = Pinara cana. Cat. 

 Lep. Het.' B. Mus., 761, (1855). This latter insect is 

 very closely allied to the Opsirhina metaphwa ^, Walker, 

 which differs in color, only in having the base of the 

 secondaries duskv. 



