1022 PEOCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD ENTOMOLOGICAL MEETING 



Explanations of the Plates illustrating Captain Froilano de Melius paper 

 on the Trichonymphid parasites of some Indian Termites — contd. 



39 — 40. Leidya campanula. 



41 Enchelyspheroides trichonympharum. 



42. Balantidium tennitis, n. sp. ^ 



43. Pyrmnympha grassii, n. sp. 



44. Pyrsonytnpha flagellata (a,iteT GiBbSai). 

 45—47. Opaliim termitis, n. sp. 



48 — i&. Nyctotherwsfietcheri,n.sp. 



50. Nydolherus termitis (after Dobell). 

 51 — 56. Franciella termitis, n. g., n. sp. 



PLATE 170. 



57 — 60. Trichonymphids from posterior intestine of Coptofermcs (after Bugnion, Mem. 



Soc. Zool. France 1910, p. 114, fig. 1). 

 61 — 68. Trichonymphids from Arrhinotermes fJavus (after Bugnion, Mem. Soc. Zool.. 



i-rancelOll.t. 3,ff. 6— 13). 



69 74. Trichonympha. agilis from Hodoiermes viarum. 



75 78. Holomasti gates elongatum (after Grassi and Sandias, I.e., t. 5, ff. 21 — 24). 



79. Pyrsonympha verlens (after Ray Lankester). 

 80 87. Trichonymphids from Calotermes greeni (after Bugnion and PopofF, 3Iem. Soc. 



Zool. France 1910, t. 5). 



88. Jcenia annectetis (after Grassi and Sandias, t. 5, f. 6). 



89. 3Iicrojcenia hexamitoides (after Grassi and Sandias, t. 5, f . 10). 



90. Gymnonympha zeylanica (after Dobell, Spolia Zeylan, VII, t. 2, f. 1). 



91. Lophomonas blattarum (after Minchin, Introd. Study Protozoa fig. 45a). 



92. L. blattarum, dividing stage (after Minchin, I.e., fig. 45c). 



93. Stephanonymplia (after Franca, Soc. Port. Sci. Nat. VIII, p. 8, fig. Dl). 



94. Caduceia theobromce (after Franca, I.e., t. 2, f. 1). 



79.— GENITALIA OF SOME CEYLONESE HESPERIADiE. 

 Bxj W. Ormiston, F.E.S. 

 (Plates 171—172.) 



The leading work on tliig Family is still " A revision of the Oriental 

 Hesperiidse " by Messrs. Elwes and Edwards. Unfortunately the authors 

 had apparently few Ceylon specimens to examine and so I fear that 

 several of our species will require renaming. 



Their work mainly decides questions of specific identity by an 

 examination of the prehensores of the males, and the authors point out 

 "that a very considerable practice in making this examination and 

 great experience in estimating the value of the characters observed, 

 are necessary to form an opinion on the subject." I confess that I have 



