

232 



11 EDUCTIONS OF MALAYAN SPECIES. 



Table 11.— Synonymy of the article Gomphostemma in Miquel, Flor. Ind. Bat, 



JligueHan name. . 



Name in present paper. 



Roiarks. 



s. 



1. G. phlomoides 



2. G. oblongum 



• • • 



• « ■ 



G. phlomoides Bth. 

 GK javanicum Bth. 



Z. 0. javanicum 



• • 



4. G, dichotomum 



5. G parviflorum 



• • • 



G. javanicum Bth. 



G. parviflorum Wall. 



6. G. crinituiE 



• • • 



G. parviflorum Wall. 



t f t 



7. G. petioiare Miq. 



• t . 



8. G. flavescens Miq. 



9. G. membranifolium 



Miq. 



10. G. macrophyllum Miq. 



G. crinitum JF#£/. 



• t . 



G. ? flavescens Ji% 



11. G. strobilinum 



• 09 



12. G. viride 



G. strobilinum Wall. var. 

 typica. 



G. _ strobilinum Wall. var. 

 viridis. 



seen 



0. dichotomum, speaks of it as very nearly related to 



Miquel under G. oblongum includes three plants i 



G. oblongum Walk Cat. n. 2154, apparently 



not yet found 



the Dutch 



G. 



oblongum Moritzi, Syst. Verzeichn., 53, not of 



Wallich — which 



cum 



which 



Wight, Ic. iv, t. 1457, not of Wallich 



G. eriocarnon ftpnth. 



G 



This plant cannot be distinguished by its descrip- 

 tion from G. parviflorum. 



Miquel has not distinguished between the two 

 plants mixed under this name, and does not claim 

 the presence of either in the Dutch territories. 



Nor does Miquel claim this as present in the Dutch 

 territories. 



Certainly does not belong" to 



with Phlomis ruqosa Benth 



Somewhat doubtfully referable to this genus. 



Tl 



is Phlomis rugosa Benth., and 

 belong to the genus Gomphoste 



does 



genus Gomphostemma. 



A plant undoubtedly congeneric with Phlomis 

 rugom Benth. 



i 



Not claimed as present in Dutch territory. 



Ditto 



ditto 



and elliptic, and thns 



ifl 



fl< 



nutlets should therefore be glabrous 



So far, indeed, does Hasskarl's description differ from the 



A NTH 



M 



gratuitously 



accounts of G. dichotomum that it is doubtful if 



that the account refers rather to a Phlomis than to a Gomphostemma. 



But if HWUi-r* A** • *• • • ;, «v^uuuu icicia ramer to a rfiiomis than to a Gomph 



eel's *Me ,W TT !* m " U P ° iQtS — *• tUs w! " hardl y be tb ° ««. *»» »' Wmb h» parallel 



P 1! 'I H ~2? °L th » T*>. 0f ^-™ - P--l 7 that of the 



anth 



§ 



The u achctnia, " however, u dorso 



corolla of a Gomphostemma of the 

 i miguc, so far as this is concerned, be accommodated along with G. Hemslet/anum. 

 convexa^ et hirsuta n (Hasskarl) are such as might belong to § Eugomphostemma 



plant i3 referred indubitably 



of this nW »r» «1*J j least be considered representative of a separate group. However, until specimens 



Motl. t IZl^li ^***». 0pi "° tt °" * «™ ***» cannot be pronounced. It, synonrn," is as 



Anthocoma flatescens Zoll., Nat. en 

 Geneesk. Arch, ii, 569 (1846) ; Hass- 

 karl, Flora xxx, £90 (1847). 



Abea Geogb. 



Flor. Ind. 



d in separate columns : 



Gomphostemma flavescens M 

 Bat. ii, 987 (1856).— G. dichotomum ? Hassle., 

 Flora xxx, 696 (18«).-G. dichotomum, A. 

 DC. Prodr. sii, 652 et 700 (1848), ntc Zoll. ct 



Phlomis ? sp. Benth. in Gen. 

 ri. ii, 1216 (1876). 



W 



Malaya; Java. Zollinger n. 2418. 



nee Benth. in DC. Prodr. xii. 



vi, 



