134 Mr. A. G. Butler 07i Lepidoptera 



" Common at Murree and Thundiani in August 1885 and 

 1886."—/. W. Y. 



6. IlipiparcMa parisatis. 



Satyrus parisatis, Kollar, Denkschr. Akad. Wien, Matli.-nat. CI. i. 

 p. 52. n. 7 (1850). 



(^. Kliairabad, 2nd May, ^ ? • 6th June ; ? . Kala Pani, 

 1st September, 1886. 



" Common on the hills round Abbottabad in August. 

 Common at Kliairabad in May and June. Seen at Attock 

 and Tret."—/. W. Y. 



7. Caller eh ia nirmala. 

 Erelia nirmala, Moore, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1865, p. 501. n. 91. 



Between Kala Pani and Thundiani, 10th August, 1886. 



Major Yerbury mentions a second species, G. annada, 

 Moore (C hyhrida, De Nic^ville, nee Butler), as being 

 " common on the lower slopes of the hill below Kala Pani — 

 a few taken above Tret, 8th October, 1885," and he thinks 

 " it is possible that the Thundiani specimens are the former 

 and the Tret specimens the latter species." 



No specimens having been forwarded in the three series 

 before me, I cannot speak positively ; but the species sent 

 in the last collection, identified as C. hyhrida by Mr. De 

 Nicdville, was simply typical C. annada^ and therefoie I think 

 it highly improbable that the hybrid form between G. annada 

 and G. scanda occurs in the neighbourhood ; if it does, G. 

 scanda must be there also, yet nothing like it has yet been 

 sent home by Major Yerbury. 



Of another species not yet sent to us and the identification 

 of which I consider extremely doubtful *, viz. GaUerehia 

 daksJia, Major Yerbury writes: — " Not uncommon at Murree 

 in company wnth 583 {G. nirmala), a few at Thundiani, 

 August and September 1886." 



The male of G. daksha differs from that sex of G. nirmala 

 in its distinctly longer wings, the ocellus of primaries more 

 transverse and oval, with equal pupils and very indistinct 

 iris ; on the upper surface of the secondaries are three ocelloid 

 white spots in addition to the ocellus, which is large and has 

 a conspicuous white pupil, as in the female of G. nirmala ; 

 the under surface of the wings is quite plain, not mottled with 

 paler scales as in G. nirmala (when seen through a lens), and 



* Specimens of C. nirmala were identified as C. daksha in the former 

 collection, and I have no doubt that such is the case in the present 

 instance. 



